vargr muscles and stuff
Timothy Collinson
(26 May 2018 19:48 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] vargr muscles and stuff
Thomas Jones-Low
(26 May 2018 20:03 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] vargr muscles and stuff
David Shaw
(26 May 2018 20:15 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] vargr muscles and stuff
Timothy Collinson
(26 May 2018 20:49 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] vargr muscles and stuff
shadow97218@xxxxxx
(27 May 2018 10:46 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] vargr muscles and stuff
David Shaw
(26 May 2018 20:08 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] vargr muscles and stuff
Thomas RUX
(26 May 2018 22:32 UTC)
|
Re: vargr muscles and stuff
Rob O'Connor
(27 May 2018 01:12 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] vargr muscles and stuff
Tim
(27 May 2018 04:00 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] vargr muscles and stuff
Timothy Collinson
(27 May 2018 10:02 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] vargr muscles and stuff Bruce Johnson (27 May 2018 22:16 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] vargr muscles and stuff
Michael Houghton
(27 May 2018 22:29 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] vargr muscles and stuff
Kelly St. Clair
(27 May 2018 22:36 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] vargr muscles and stuff
Bruce Johnson
(28 May 2018 15:52 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] vargr muscles and stuff
shadow@xxxxxx
(30 May 2018 07:46 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] vargr muscles and stuff
Timothy Collinson
(30 May 2018 10:30 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] vargr muscles and stuff
Bruce Johnson
(30 May 2018 16:41 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] vargr muscles and stuff
David Shaw
(28 May 2018 00:50 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] vargr muscles and stuff
Phil Pugliese
(28 May 2018 11:38 UTC)
|
> On May 27, 2018, at 3:46 AM, xxxxxx@gmail.com wrote: > > On 26 May 2018 at 16:03, Thomas Jones-Low wrote: > >> On 5/26/2018 3:48 PM, Timothy Collinson wrote: >> >>> I needed to name some TL4 explosives (on Pysadi, harvesting howood) >>> and came up with quadroglycerine - it was supposed to be a sort of >>> homage to triticale being turned into quadrotriticale for Star >>> Trek's Trouble With Tribbles episode. But is the nature of >>> glycerine such that that's just completely ridiculous? >>> >> >> Welll, there is Nitroglycerin aka trinitroglycerine, and >> Trinitrotoluene (aka >> TNT). Glycerine doesn't have the attachment for additional nitrogen >> groups. >> >> TNT on the other hand. In theory, since the core of toluene is a >> benzene ring, >> you can attach up to 6 NO2 groups. Of course these are unstable, and >> adding more makes the explosive more powerful. So QNT would be really >> scary stuff. > > You want scary? > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Octaazacubane > > More than 5 times as powerful as TNT. And it decomposes into nitrogen > gas (so no toxic fumes). > > Then there's https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cubic_gauche_nitrogen > which is 50% more energetic. > > For that matter, metallic hydrogen (if it turns out to be metastable) > would be around 50 times as powerful as TNT. Of course, all those > very energetic hydrogen ions encountewring oxygen (and nitrogen) in > air would boost things a fair bit. > > If you want something less drastic try > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Octanitrocubane There’s a chemist who has (had? it’s been a while) a blog detailing ‘Scary things people make in chemistry labs’ mainly about really unstable compounds. It’s an entertaining/horrifying read for someone chemically inclined, lots of notes about ‘Do not let this compound get above -50 degrees.’ or ‘all apparatus must be completely dry at all times, trace amounts of water will cause it to explode/deflagrate/burn uncontrollably’, etc. Also tales of stuff that makes Alien blood eating it’s way through 5 decks look like ‘oops I spilled some kool-aid, time for some Bounty!' I may have even been introduced to him here at some point over the years... -- Bruce Johnson University of Arizona College of Pharmacy Information Technology Group Institutions do not have opinions, merely customs