Re: [TML] The meaning of world tech level Rusty Witherspoon (12 Feb 2018 19:30 UTC)
Re: [TML] The meaning of world tech level Tim (12 Feb 2018 23:35 UTC)
Re: [TML] The meaning of world tech level Cian Witherspoon (13 Feb 2018 00:17 UTC)
Re: [TML] The meaning of world tech level Cian Witherspoon (13 Feb 2018 00:35 UTC)
Re: [TML] The meaning of world tech level Tim (13 Feb 2018 00:56 UTC)
Re: [TML] The meaning of world tech level Cian Witherspoon (13 Feb 2018 01:35 UTC)
Re: [TML] The meaning of world tech level Phil Pugliese (13 Feb 2018 00:17 UTC)
Re: [TML] The meaning of world tech level Tim (13 Feb 2018 00:43 UTC)
Re: [TML] The meaning of world tech level Phil Pugliese (13 Feb 2018 07:32 UTC)
Re: [TML] The meaning of world tech level Cian Witherspoon (13 Feb 2018 08:01 UTC)
Re: [TML] The meaning of world tech level Phil Pugliese (13 Feb 2018 18:25 UTC)
Re: [TML] The meaning of world tech level RiftRoamer (15 Feb 2018 15:38 UTC)
Re: [TML] The meaning of world tech level Caleuche (15 Feb 2018 17:35 UTC)
Re: [TML] The meaning of world tech level Bruce Johnson (15 Feb 2018 21:03 UTC)
Re: [TML] The meaning of world tech level Phil Pugliese (15 Feb 2018 21:53 UTC)
Re: [TML] The meaning of world tech level Greg Nokes (16 Feb 2018 08:14 UTC)
Re: [TML] The meaning of world tech level Phil Pugliese (16 Feb 2018 22:04 UTC)
Re: [TML] The meaning of world tech level Richard Aiken (27 Feb 2018 03:07 UTC)
Re: [TML] The meaning of world tech level shadow@xxxxxx (21 Feb 2018 04:58 UTC)
Re: [TML] The meaning of world tech level Rupert Boleyn (13 Feb 2018 08:33 UTC)
Re: [TML] The meaning of world tech level Phil Pugliese (13 Feb 2018 18:28 UTC)
Re: [TML] The meaning of world tech level Bruce Johnson (13 Feb 2018 23:03 UTC)

Re: [TML] The meaning of world tech level Tim 13 Feb 2018 00:43 UTC

On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 12:17:26AM +0000, Phil Pugliese (via tml list) wrote:
> However, the 'ocean' in the OTU is a 'wall' that blocks
> insta-commo.Which is NOT the case w/ a real ocean.

You don't need insta-commo to ship compact high-tech items over a
medium where the rate of variation in demand is slower than the speed
of communication anyway.

Yes, it might add a few percent to the price of the item, and if you
want an ultra-special order then you might have to wait longer for it
to come from the system where it is manufactured.  But for the bulk of
the trade, there will be a relatively steady flow of items, parts and
so on, as well as nearer distribution points with enough stock to
cover typical variations in demand and upstream supply.

There may be small-scale facilities for manufacture-on-demand a couple
of systems away at substantially greater price for even those special
orders.

Slow communication alone is not a factor that would drive prices
substantially up or availability greatly down.  There would have to be
other factors as well, not yet discussed in this thread.

- Tim