on the subject of surface to air missiles Timothy Collinson (05 Feb 2018 21:28 UTC)
Re: [TML] on the subject of surface to air missiles Caleuche (05 Feb 2018 23:02 UTC)
Re: [TML] on the subject of surface to air missiles James Catchpole (05 Feb 2018 23:18 UTC)
Re: [TML] on the subject of surface to air missiles Caleuche (06 Feb 2018 05:07 UTC)
Re: [TML] on the subject of surface to air missiles Kurt Feltenberger (06 Feb 2018 05:15 UTC)
Re: [TML] on the subject of surface to air missiles Rupert Boleyn (06 Feb 2018 11:04 UTC)
Re: [TML] on the subject of surface to air missiles Timothy Collinson (08 Feb 2018 16:49 UTC)
Re: [TML] on the subject of surface to air missiles Kurt Feltenberger (06 Feb 2018 05:13 UTC)
Re: [TML] on the subject of surface to air missiles Kurt Feltenberger (06 Feb 2018 05:12 UTC)
Re: [TML] on the subject of surface to air missiles Caleuche (06 Feb 2018 07:20 UTC)
Re: [TML] on the subject of surface to air missiles Caleuche (06 Feb 2018 07:54 UTC)
Re: [TML] on the subject of surface to air missiles Caleuche (09 Feb 2018 08:51 UTC)
Re: [TML] on the subject of surface to air missiles Caleuche (09 Feb 2018 09:11 UTC)
Re: [TML] on the subject of surface to air missiles Timothy Collinson (09 Feb 2018 16:26 UTC)
Re: [TML] on the subject of surface to air missiles Timothy Collinson (09 Feb 2018 16:25 UTC)
Re: [TML] on the subject of surface to air missiles Caleuche (09 Feb 2018 22:37 UTC)
Re: [TML] on the subject of surface to air missiles Postmark (10 Feb 2018 00:57 UTC)
Re: [TML] on the subject of surface to air missiles Caleuche (10 Feb 2018 01:26 UTC)
Re: [TML] on the subject of surface to air missiles Kurt Feltenberger (10 Feb 2018 05:04 UTC)
Re: [TML] on the subject of surface to air missiles Caleuche (10 Feb 2018 07:13 UTC)
Re: [TML] on the subject of surface to air missiles Caleuche (10 Feb 2018 22:45 UTC)
Re: [TML] on the subject of surface to air missiles Caleuche (10 Feb 2018 23:45 UTC)
Re: [TML] on the subject of surface to air missiles Kurt Feltenberger (11 Feb 2018 01:23 UTC)
Re: [TML] on the subject of surface to air missiles Caleuche (11 Feb 2018 03:57 UTC)
Re: [TML] on the subject of surface to air missiles Rupert Boleyn (11 Feb 2018 14:46 UTC)
Re: [TML] on the subject of surface to air missiles Kurt Feltenberger (11 Feb 2018 20:24 UTC)

Re: [TML] on the subject of surface to air missiles Kurt Feltenberger 06 Feb 2018 05:15 UTC

On 2/5/2018 6:18 PM, James Catchpole (via tml list) wrote:
> Real world SAMs are made like that because that's all that is needed.
> Anti-tank missiles, on the other hand, are designed to punch through
> armour. Of course, aircraft move a lot faster than tanks, so a
> proximity detonation is a much more viable strategy when trying to
> target an aircraft...

This is a good point...if the original weapon was a "rocket launcher",
that would probably be something along the lines of a LAW or RPG, with a
shaped charge warhead designed to penetrate armor, and not a blast
warhead (continuous rod or other) that is designed to destroy aerodynamics.

--
Kurt Feltenberger
xxxxxx@thepaw.org/xxxxxx@yahoo.com
“Before today, I was scared to live, after today, I'm scared I'm not living enough." - Me