Meson Guns CT vs MT vs etc. Phil Pugliese (25 Jan 2018 21:37 UTC)
Re: [TML] Meson Guns CT vs MT vs etc. Catherine Berry (25 Jan 2018 23:30 UTC)
Re: [TML] Meson Guns CT vs MT vs etc. Bruce Johnson (25 Jan 2018 23:34 UTC)
Re: [TML] Meson Guns CT vs MT vs etc. Catherine Berry (26 Jan 2018 00:05 UTC)
Re: [TML] Meson Guns CT vs MT vs etc. Jerry Barrington (27 Jan 2018 01:17 UTC)
Re: [TML] Meson Guns CT vs MT vs etc. Kurt Feltenberger (27 Jan 2018 01:25 UTC)
Re: [TML] Meson Guns CT vs MT vs etc. Phil Pugliese (26 Jan 2018 02:13 UTC)
Re: [TML] Meson Guns CT vs MT vs etc. Rupert Boleyn (26 Jan 2018 00:57 UTC)
Re: [TML] Meson Guns CT vs MT vs etc. Phil Pugliese (26 Jan 2018 02:20 UTC)

Re: [TML] Meson Guns CT vs MT vs etc. Rupert Boleyn 26 Jan 2018 00:57 UTC

On 26Jan2018 1229, Catherine Berry wrote:

> One thing that I recall being mentioned somewhere -- maybe on this list --
> is that one would imagine that, especially early on, the powers enforcing
> the isolation of this system would concentrate heavily on making sure that
> the robots didn't capture a working J-drive. Canon already tells us that
> getting a working example allows for quick replication. It may be that the
> robots would ignore such an opportunity; it may also be they'd be boiling
> out into the galaxy on a crusade against everyone else a year later. Not
> the sort of risk you want to take. Thus it's surprising to the point of
> jaw-dropping that the Vilani were so willing to land ships there once they
> figured out most of what was going on.

I would assume that the 'ships' landed had no jump drives, and their
parent vessels were in high orbit, out of meson gun range.

--
Rupert Boleyn <xxxxxx@gmail.com>
Chief Assistant to the Assistant Chief