Odd Tech questions.
Evyn MacDude
(28 Sep 2017 02:08 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Odd Tech questions.
Cole
(28 Sep 2017 02:49 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Odd Tech questions.
Kelly St. Clair
(28 Sep 2017 02:59 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Odd Tech questions.
Kelly St. Clair
(28 Sep 2017 03:05 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Odd Tech questions.
Rupert Boleyn
(28 Sep 2017 06:01 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Odd Tech questions.
Jerry Barrington
(28 Sep 2017 13:37 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Odd Tech questions.
C. Berry
(28 Sep 2017 18:35 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Odd Tech questions.
Kelly St. Clair
(28 Sep 2017 18:38 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Odd Tech questions.
C. Berry
(28 Sep 2017 18:42 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Odd Tech questions.
shadow@xxxxxx
(29 Sep 2017 20:44 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Odd Tech questions.
Amber Witherspoon
(29 Sep 2017 22:06 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Odd Tech questions. Rupert Boleyn (28 Sep 2017 04:59 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Odd Tech questions.
Evyn MacDude
(28 Sep 2017 07:35 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Odd Tech questions.
Tim
(28 Sep 2017 03:51 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Odd Tech questions.
Amber Witherspoon
(28 Sep 2017 04:48 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Odd Tech questions.
Evyn MacDude
(28 Sep 2017 07:42 UTC)
|
On 28Sep2017 1559, Kelly St. Clair wrote: > Well, consider that in the real world, strong radars and transmitters - > the kind mounted on ships and surface installations - can't really be > /stopped/ from doing this, at least at close range. A comm laser is > just a collimated version, operating at a different range of wavelengths > (maybe). Even fairly small navigation radars, of the sort mounted on small pleasure boats, can cause eye damage if you work near them when they're turned on (microwaved eyeballs, ummmm....). -- Rupert Boleyn <xxxxxx@gmail.com> Chief Assistant to the Assistant Chief