Re: Landing vs hovering (wasRe: [TML] What class of Port isthis?)
Phil Pugliese 26 Aug 2017 08:18 UTC
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On Fri, 8/25/17, Kelly St. Clair <xxxxxx@efn.org> wrote:
Subject: Re: Landing vs hovering (wasRe: [TML] What class of Port isthis?)
To: xxxxxx@simplelists.com
Date: Friday, August 25, 2017, 12:23 PM
On 8/25/2017 11:18 AM, C. Berry
wrote:
> The CG field is handwavium, so
it requires as much power as the rules
>
say it requires. :) But there's no *physics* reason for
it to require
> any nonzero amount of
power. Heck, it could emit power, and unicorns
> that fart rainbows. The whole idea of CG
has some very fundamental
> problems in
terms of real physics, so once you allow it in, you open the
> door to anything.
That way lies madness. Seriously.
Once you take logic and consistency off the
table, you're not playing
science
fiction anymore, IMO. Might as well strap swans or
reindeer to
your scout/courier and let them
provide the motive power. Or say, "My
finger guns are disintegrator pistols."
You don't have to specify
/how/ it works, exactly. But however it
/does/ work, everything else has to work
logically from that and
interact with
physics in predictable ways. Otherwise it's magic, and
not the Clarkian kind either.
---------------
Kelly St. Clair xxxxxx@efn.org
-------------------------------------------------
And that's why MegaTrav & the morphs that followed went so wrong when they all tried to provide ultra-complicated & ultra-detailed design rules & explanations. The only result was to create an endlessly complicated mess that just goes on & on & on.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------