Re: [TML] What class of Port is this? Phil Pugliese (12 Aug 2017 14:32 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] What class of Port is this?
tmr0195@xxxxxx
(12 Aug 2017 19:54 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] What class of Port is this?
Kelly St. Clair
(12 Aug 2017 20:03 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] What class of Port is this?
tmr0195@xxxxxx
(12 Aug 2017 22:29 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] What class of Port is this?
Kelly St. Clair
(13 Aug 2017 14:19 UTC)
|
Clarification; When I said, " I can see where it might happen but I think it's be pretty rare." I meant, "It would be pretty rare, but not unprecedented, to find a planetary HiPort w/o a DownPort". p.s. there's also Shionthy in the 'Marches where, according to canon the red zone was applied due to 'shards' of antimatter present in the system's asteroid belt. Apparently a 'leftover' from a battle during 'Grandfather's War' that shattered a planet that had previously been present where the 'belt is now. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- On Fri, 8/11/17, <tmr0195@comcast.net> wrote: Subject: Re: [TML] What class of Port is this? To: "TML" <xxxxxx@simplelists.com> Date: Friday, August 11, 2017, 10:35 PM Evening PDT, If there are no ground installations because anything of value is mined from asteroids I can see a planet having only an orbital port facility. However, if there are facilities on a planet's surface I image there is some sort of port to allow transfer of material and personnel that only allows foreign vessels to dock at orbital facilities. Tom Rux From: "Phil Pugliese (via tml list)" <xxxxxx@simplelists.com> To: "TML" <xxxxxx@simplelists.com> Sent: Friday, August 11, 2017 4:30:28 PM Subject: Re: [TML] What class of Port is this? -------------------------------------------- On Fri, 8/11/17, via tml list <xxxxxx@simplelists.com> wrote: Subject: Re: [TML] What class of Port is this? To: xxxxxx@simplelists.com Date: Friday, August 11, 2017, 2:13 PM On 11 Aug 2017 at 17:37, Phil Pugliese (via tml list) wrote: > p.s. Anyone ever think about a situation where a planet might have a > HiPort but no DownPort? Well, a size 0 world might do that. Ditto for worlds with the stranger atmosphere types. And that's almost certainly the case with all red-zoned worlds and some amber. There could be other reasons as well, say there's a religion that considers the planet holy (think Mecca). They might only allow specially crewed and putified shuttles to land. And some of the stricter government types might have similar restrictions. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Well, 'asteroid' belts aren't really worlds or planets in my book. Even if a starport was 'anchored' to one of the larger 'rocks', I don't think it would actually be considered a down port. Not as long as unstreamlined ships could dock. And there are red zone worlds that must have down ports, Andory & Candor in 5sisters/spinward marches for example. They are Droyne worlds that are capable of starflight. In fact there's even a Droyne trading company hq'd there! Also, elsewhere in the 'Marches, there's Victoria, (where the weird starship in the 1st CT LBB double adventure, AnnicNova, came from. I believe that the writeup for the system was published in a CT JTAS article. Lastly, a lot would depend on the specifics of the Imperial Charter granted to a specific system. I can see where the ImpGov would insist on a downport, w/ it's attendant extrality zone, for various reasons. I can see where it might happen but I think it's be pretty rare. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----- The Traveller Mailing List Archives at http://archives.simplelists.com/tml Report problems to xxxxxx@simplelists.com To unsubscribe from this list please go to http://archives.simplelists.com ----- The Traveller Mailing List Archives at http://archives.simplelists.com/tml Report problems to xxxxxx@simplelists.com To unsubscribe from this list please go to http://www.simplelists.com/confirm.php?u=EwREIRgLK8vaUEhNlnoNdSGKwnjoID8a