Changing The Jump Drive
Jeff Zeitlin
(29 Jul 2017 01:04 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Changing The Jump Drive
Amber Witherspoon
(29 Jul 2017 01:28 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Changing The Jump Drive
Amber Witherspoon
(29 Jul 2017 01:57 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Changing The Jump Drive
Amber Witherspoon
(29 Jul 2017 15:58 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Changing The Jump Drive
Timothy Collinson
(04 Aug 2017 17:47 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Changing The Jump Drive
C. Berry
(04 Aug 2017 18:03 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Changing The Jump Drive Amber Witherspoon (04 Aug 2017 19:51 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Changing The Jump Drive
Kurt Feltenberger
(04 Aug 2017 23:13 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Changing The Jump Drive
C. Berry
(05 Aug 2017 20:30 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Changing The Jump Drive
Amber Witherspoon
(05 Aug 2017 21:15 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Changing The Jump Drive
Tim
(06 Aug 2017 03:09 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Changing The Jump Drive
Tim
(29 Jul 2017 09:02 UTC)
|
The solution is simple: make the higher order jump drives even more expensive and space consuming. Or, change it from the M-Drive doing the pushing to a secondary part of the jump drive, allowing a matrix of Order^Exponent. So a 1^1 is the cheapest, while a 6^6 is the most expensive one possible, and has the highest minimum tonnage requirements (say, 100,000 tons). We still won't hit Andromeda though, even with the 6^6 drive making it only 18 jumps away - Jump 2 or 3 is the maximum that allows deep space fuel depots that don't require a local hydrogen source (any higher jumps require 100% or more of the ship's tonnage to carry two jumps and a decent fuel load, unless you have huge J4 fuel freighters). On 8/4/17, C. Berry <xxxxxx@gmail.com> wrote: > The trouble with a galaxy-spanning game is that there are hundreds of > billions of stars in our galaxy. Unless the campaign totally railroads the > characters, there's no way for the GM to be ready for all the places > characters might go. Traveller narrows the choices enough that you can > flesh out a dozen worlds and support a long campaign. > > > On Aug 4, 2017 10:47, "Timothy Collinson" <xxxxxx@port.ac.uk> > wrote: > >> Oooh. I do rather like idea of a setting where a galaxy is accessible a >> la >> Asimov's Foundation. >> >> Or Lensman... I really out to tackle them again. No recollection of a >> schoolboy reading. >> >> tc >> >>