|
FTL Drive, here we come?
David Shaw
(19 Apr 2017 15:34 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: [TML] FTL Drive, here we come?
Jeffrey Schwartz
(19 Apr 2017 22:34 UTC)
|
||
|
(missing)
|
||
|
(missing)
|
||
|
Re: [TML] FTL Drive, here we come?
Richard Aiken
(19 Apr 2017 23:30 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: [TML] FTL Drive, here we come?
C. Berry
(19 Apr 2017 22:39 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: [TML] FTL Drive, here we come?
Jeffrey Schwartz
(19 Apr 2017 23:32 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: [TML] FTL Drive, here we come?
C. Berry
(19 Apr 2017 23:42 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: [TML] FTL Drive, here we come?
Richard Aiken
(20 Apr 2017 01:04 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: [TML] FTL Drive, here we come?
Tim
(20 Apr 2017 04:10 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: [TML] FTL Drive, here we come?
Tim
(20 Apr 2017 02:43 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: [TML] FTL Drive, here we come?
Richard Aiken
(20 Apr 2017 02:59 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: [TML] FTL Drive, here we come? Tim (20 Apr 2017 04:14 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: [TML] FTL Drive, here we come?
Richard Aiken
(19 Apr 2017 23:24 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: [TML] FTL Drive, here we come?
shadow@xxxxxx
(20 Apr 2017 15:40 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: [TML] FTL Drive, here we come?
Richard Aiken
(20 Apr 2017 17:38 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: [TML] FTL Drive, here we come?
Tim
(21 Apr 2017 02:41 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: [TML] FTL Drive, here we come?
Richard Aiken
(21 Apr 2017 03:13 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: [TML] FTL Drive, here we come?
Richard Aiken
(21 Apr 2017 03:18 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: [TML] FTL Drive, here we come?
Richard Aiken
(21 Apr 2017 03:27 UTC)
|
||
On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 10:59:24PM -0400, Richard Aiken wrote: > While it may be inaccurate in it's wording, what the article actually said > was that when the atoms were released from the supercooled laser trap, they > expanded and "some displayed negative mass." Yes, it means that for the purposes of that particular experimental setup, they behaved in a very limited way as something of negative mass would have behaved. - Tim
