It's a BIG one!
Phil Pugliese
(13 Apr 2017 18:59 UTC)
|
||
Re: [TML] It's a BIG one!
Kurt Feltenberger
(13 Apr 2017 19:56 UTC)
|
||
Re: [TML] It's a BIG one!
Postmark
(14 Apr 2017 22:38 UTC)
|
||
Re: [TML] It's a BIG one!
Rupert Boleyn
(14 Apr 2017 22:50 UTC)
|
||
Re: [TML] It's a BIG one!
Bruce Johnson
(14 Apr 2017 23:27 UTC)
|
||
Re: [TML] It's a BIG one!
Charles Brogdon
(14 Apr 2017 23:16 UTC)
|
||
Re: [TML] It's a BIG one!
Bruce Johnson
(14 Apr 2017 23:25 UTC)
|
||
Re: [TML] It's a BIG one!
Rupert Boleyn
(15 Apr 2017 00:01 UTC)
|
||
Re: [TML] It's a BIG one! Michael Houghton (14 Apr 2017 23:50 UTC)
|
||
(missing)
|
||
(missing)
|
||
Re: [TML] It's a BIG one!
Richard Aiken
(19 Apr 2017 00:29 UTC)
|
||
Re: [TML] It's a BIG one!
Rupert Boleyn
(19 Apr 2017 00:59 UTC)
|
||
Re: [TML] It's a BIG one!
Richard Aiken
(19 Apr 2017 01:13 UTC)
|
Howdy! On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 6:38 PM, Postmark <xxxxxx@btinternet.com> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 2:59 PM -0400, "Phil Pugliese (via tml list)" > <xxxxxx@simplelists.com> wrote: > > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> [I'd sure like to see the before & after photo recon!] >> >> FYI; >> >> US drops largest non-nuclear bomb in Afghanistan >> >> (RNN) - The U.S Air Force dropped a MOAB bomb in the Nangahar Province in >> Afghanistan on a suspected ISIS target, military officials told CNN. >> The bomb was dropped on a target in the Nangahar Province of Afghanistan, >> near its border with Pakistan. >> Called "the mother of all bombs," the GBU-43/B Massive Ordnance Air Blast >> is a large-yield conventional bomb. >> The MOAB is 30 feet long and weight 21,000 pounds. It detonates about six >> feet off the ground, maximizing the range of its destructive power. >> It leaves a blast radius of a mile in each direction. >> This is apparently the first time the bomb has been used in combat, though >> it has been tested in various places, including at Eglin Air Force Base, FL. >> >> Copyright 2017 Raycom News Network. All rights reserved. > > I'm left wondering why the USAF designed and built such pointless bomb. > > If the target is on top of the ground, a number of smaller bombs would do > the job. > > If the target is underground, one of Barnes Wallis's 10ton Grand Slam > "Earthquake" bombs detonating 10's of metres underground would be more > effective. > > I mean, it's not as if we didn't let you play with a couple in 1946. > > ;-) > As I understand it, this bomb is designed to generate one monstrous shock wave/overpressure wave. The idea here was to get the blast wave deep into caves and tunnels. yours, Michael -- Michael Houghton | Herveus d'Ormonde xxxxxx@gmail.com | White Wolf and the Phoenix Lanham, MD, USA | Tablet and Inkle bands, and other stuff | http://whitewolfandphoenix.com