starting your ship
Timothy Collinson
(23 Mar 2017 17:29 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] starting your ship
James Davies
(24 Mar 2017 01:13 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] starting your ship
Evyn MacDude
(24 Mar 2017 01:47 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] starting your ship
shadow@xxxxxx
(24 Mar 2017 06:49 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] starting your ship
shadow@xxxxxx
(24 Mar 2017 06:49 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] starting your ship
Jeff Zeitlin
(24 Mar 2017 12:02 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] starting your ship
tmr0195@xxxxxx
(24 Mar 2017 13:47 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] starting your ship
Alex Goodwin
(24 Mar 2017 14:36 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] starting your ship
tmr0195@xxxxxx
(24 Mar 2017 15:53 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] starting your ship
Kelly St. Clair
(24 Mar 2017 20:08 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] starting your ship
Timothy Collinson
(24 Mar 2017 20:29 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] starting your ship
shadow@xxxxxx
(25 Mar 2017 18:56 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] starting your ship
shadow@xxxxxx
(25 Mar 2017 18:56 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] starting your ship
Greg Nokes
(26 Mar 2017 17:53 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] starting your ship
shadow@xxxxxx
(27 Mar 2017 18:48 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] starting your ship
Rupert Boleyn
(24 Mar 2017 20:53 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] starting your ship
shadow@xxxxxx
(25 Mar 2017 18:56 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] starting your ship
Jeffrey Schwartz
(25 Mar 2017 21:29 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] starting your ship shadow@xxxxxx (27 Mar 2017 18:48 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] starting your ship
Jeffrey Schwartz
(28 Mar 2017 01:25 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] starting your ship
Tim
(28 Mar 2017 07:04 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] starting your ship
Richard Aiken
(28 Mar 2017 15:09 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] starting your ship
Jeffrey Schwartz
(28 Mar 2017 15:50 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] starting your ship
Richard Aiken
(11 Apr 2017 22:14 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] starting your ship
Timothy Collinson
(25 Mar 2017 22:18 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] starting your ship
Rupert Boleyn
(26 Mar 2017 02:08 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] starting your ship
tmr0195@xxxxxx
(26 Mar 2017 13:16 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] starting your ship
tmr0195@xxxxxx
(26 Mar 2017 12:34 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] starting your ship
Andrew Long
(26 Mar 2017 13:03 UTC)
|
On 25 Mar 2017 at 17:28, Jeffrey Schwartz wrote: > On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 2:54 PM, (via tml list) > <xxxxxx@simplelists.com> wrote: > >> If it requires the services of a > starport - of at least grade C - and >> it's the _starport_ that needs > to be jumpstarted with the jump plant, >> you've got an ... > interesting ... situation... > > Even ignoring that, consider what > sort of cables you'd need to handle > that much power! > > > Traveller has room temp superconductors, which would help quite a bit > in that regard. Not as much as you might think. superconductors have *three* "critical" values to worry about. Critical temp: above this they aren't superconducting anymore Critical current: get more amps than this flowing and it quits being a superconductor. And a short time later it will explosively vaporize. Critical field: If the magnetic field strength exceeds this, it quits being a superconductor. When you are running massive amounts of power thru the cable, *any* of those happening will result in a positive feedback loop as the cable goes from zero resistance to rather high resistance. which increases the temp which increases the resistance which... Like I said, positive feedback loop. With an end result of "Boom" as the cable explosively vaporizes. -- Leonard Erickson (aka shadow) shadow at shadowgard dot com