|
The Universe is strange....
Bruce Johnson
(22 Feb 2017 19:01 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: [TML] The Universe is strange....
Peter L. Berghold
(22 Feb 2017 19:22 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: [TML] The Universe is strange....
Rob Davenport
(22 Feb 2017 21:15 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: [TML] The Universe is strange....
C. Berry
(22 Feb 2017 21:59 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: [TML] The Universe is strange.... Rupert Boleyn (23 Feb 2017 01:22 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: [TML] The Universe is strange....
Jeffrey Schwartz
(02 Mar 2017 18:53 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: [TML] The Universe is strange....
C. Berry
(02 Mar 2017 19:05 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: [TML] The Universe is strange....
Jeffrey Schwartz
(05 Mar 2017 14:03 UTC)
|
||
|
(missing)
|
||
|
(missing)
|
||
|
Re: [TML] The Universe is strange....
David Shaw
(05 Mar 2017 14:43 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: [TML] The Universe is strange....
Jeffrey Schwartz
(05 Mar 2017 17:58 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: [TML] The Universe is strange....
David Shaw
(05 Mar 2017 18:14 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: [TML] The Universe is strange....
Thomas Jones-Low
(05 Mar 2017 18:48 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: [TML] The Universe is strange....
Jeffrey Schwartz
(05 Mar 2017 19:07 UTC)
|
||
|
(missing)
|
||
|
(missing)
|
||
|
Re: [TML] The Universe is strange....
David Shaw
(05 Mar 2017 19:16 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: [TML] The Universe is strange....
Jerry Barrington
(06 Mar 2017 12:39 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: [TML] The Universe is strange....
Thomas Jones-Low
(06 Mar 2017 13:10 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: [TML] The Universe is strange....
shadow@xxxxxx
(08 Mar 2017 14:01 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: [TML] The Universe is strange....
C. Berry
(08 Mar 2017 17:34 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: [TML] The Universe is strange....
Jeffrey Schwartz
(08 Mar 2017 18:21 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: [TML] The Universe is strange....
masterhlrong
(22 Feb 2017 23:17 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: [TML] The Universe is strange....
Bruce Johnson
(22 Feb 2017 23:34 UTC)
|
||
On 23Feb2017 1058, C. Berry wrote: > I am very surprised that such a system is dynamically stable. You'd > expect planets that close together to perturb one another quite a bit. > I'm looking forward to reading more about this. I expect that they're in a set of 'interlocking' harmonics with each other. That, and tidal effects from it and their close spacing may mean that they are not (all) tidally locked to the primary, too. -- Rupert Boleyn <xxxxxx@gmail.com> Chief Assistant to the Assistant Chief
