The Concorde, was Re: [TML] Alternate Jump Drive: Request for Comment
Phil Pugliese 01 Dec 2016 17:38 UTC
--------------------------------------------
On Wed, 11/30/16, Jeff Zeitlin <xxxxxx@gmail.com> wrote:
Subject: Re: [TML] Alternate Jump Drive: Request for Comment
To: xxxxxx@simplelists.com
Date: Wednesday, November 30, 2016, 6:14 PM
On Sun, 27 Nov 2016
14:10:08 -0800, Greg Nokes <xxxxxx@nokes.name>
wrote:
>There would probably start to be levels of
service between certain
>systems - IE
“we can get your data/mail/cargo/people there in 40 hours
>rather then 150, so we will charge X
more."
>
>
>I’d think it would be like the fed ex
overnight vs fed ex ground - you
>are
paying for time.
[...]
>I’d see a lot of first
class, second class and normal rate traffic.
>So if you have a package
that needs to get there really fast, you can
>pony up and buy space on the faster ship. I
see a lot of businesses
>doing this -
for stuff and for people. If you have employees traveling
>for meetings, spending 150 hours in
jump is a bigger money sink then
>spending 40 hours in jump, and time is
money - salary and lost
>opportunities.
If you have a work team idling waiting on parts or
>materials, getting there 120 hours quicker
could be a huge win.
>Honestly if you have two high pop worlds a
jump or two apart, I could
>see a the
majority of traffic using the faster jump.
Well, that would depend on the
cost difference - the Concorde, for
example,
never really became the flight of choice for NYC-LON or
NYC-PAR trips because the cost was so high
relative to even
first-class on a 747. And
the Concorde wasn't as nice as a 747 first
class.
(I
walked through the retired Concorde at the Intrepid Sea Air
Space
museum in NYC. Sucker is *tiny*! I
can't imagine wanting to be cooped
up in
it, even if it would be for only half the time of a 747
trip.)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I recall reading an article, way, way, back when, stating that some international assoc of air carriers *forced* the Concorde operators to charge as much as they did! As I recall, they were forced to charge a certain % above the other first-class rates.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------