Ping John Geoffrey (17 Nov 2016 17:26 UTC)
Re: [TML] Ping tmr0195@xxxxxx (17 Nov 2016 17:36 UTC)
Re: [TML] Ping Graham Donald (18 Nov 2016 00:56 UTC)
Re: [TML] Ping David Shaw (18 Nov 2016 07:31 UTC)
Re: [TML] Ping shadow@xxxxxx (19 Nov 2016 01:00 UTC)
Re: [TML] Ping shadow@xxxxxx (19 Nov 2016 01:00 UTC)
Re: [TML] Ping Bruce Johnson (19 Nov 2016 02:21 UTC)
Re: [TML] Ping Kurt Feltenberger (19 Nov 2016 02:37 UTC)
Re: [TML] Ping Tim (19 Nov 2016 08:11 UTC)
Re: [TML] Ping Jeffrey Schwartz (19 Nov 2016 15:07 UTC)

Re: [TML] Ping shadow@xxxxxx 19 Nov 2016 00:59 UTC

On 18 Nov 2016 at 7:31, David Shaw wrote:

> All of mine at the moment are from ladies of negotiable affection.
> Apparently, there are *thousands* of women in my area looking for
> secret trysts with someone other than their partner which, given where
> I live, means pretty much *every* woman, which I do find a little hard
> to believe and leads me to think that some of these e-mails might be
> less than genuine. David Shaw

Well, if the ones I used to get were true, I'd have a quadrupleH
chest and the contents of my pants would scare a horse...

ObTrav: the PCs find out *why* that shipment of "enhancement
products" was so cheap. Seems that pills from two different lines got
mixed together.

So *something* will get bigger, but what can change from pill to pill
in the same bottle.

--
Leonard Erickson (aka shadow)
shadow at shadowgard dot com