|
Multiple habitable worlds in system
Christopher Sean Hilton
(16 Oct 2016 22:30 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Multiple habitable worlds in system
Evyn MacDude
(17 Oct 2016 01:12 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Multiple habitable worlds in system
Christopher Sean Hilton
(17 Oct 2016 03:13 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Multiple habitable worlds in system
Tim
(17 Oct 2016 02:53 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Multiple habitable worlds in system
Jerry Barrington
(17 Oct 2016 09:00 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Multiple habitable worlds in system
Tim
(17 Oct 2016 12:55 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Multiple habitable worlds in system
Jerry Barrington
(17 Oct 2016 18:09 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Multiple habitable worlds in system
Kelly St. Clair
(17 Oct 2016 20:10 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Multiple habitable worlds in system
C. Berry
(17 Oct 2016 20:17 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Multiple habitable worlds in system
Bruce Johnson
(17 Oct 2016 20:26 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Multiple habitable worlds in system
C. Berry
(17 Oct 2016 20:34 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Multiple habitable worlds in system
Bruce Johnson
(17 Oct 2016 20:45 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Multiple habitable worlds in system
C. Berry
(17 Oct 2016 20:52 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Multiple habitable worlds in system shadow@xxxxxx (18 Oct 2016 06:24 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Multiple habitable worlds in system
Jerry Barrington
(18 Oct 2016 08:25 UTC)
|
On 17 Oct 2016 at 23:55, Tim wrote: > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 05:00:54AM -0400, Jerry Barrington wrote: > > Regarding planets around a dim star (or technically *any* multiple > > system): GM should calculate the blackbody temperature of each > > planet by summing 278*(L^.25)/(R^.5) for all stars. > > Actually they should sum L/R^2, take the fourth root of the sum, and > multiply by ~278 K. In most cases this will be very similar to just > taking the maximum (though always at least slightly greater). Shouldn't that be -273 K ??? Absolute zero is -273.15 C, isn't it? -- Leonard Erickson (aka shadow) shadow at shadowgard dot com
