Re: Daily digest for tml@simplelists.com William Barnett-Lewis (12 Oct 2016 22:26 UTC)
Re: [TML] Re: Daily digest for tml@simplelists.com Richard Aiken (13 Oct 2016 02:25 UTC)
Re: [TML] Re: Daily digest for tml@simplelists.com Jeffrey Schwartz (16 Oct 2016 04:46 UTC)
Re: [TML] Re: Daily digest for tml@simplelists.com Richard Aiken (16 Oct 2016 05:45 UTC)
Re: [TML] Re: Daily digest for tml@simplelists.com tmr0195@xxxxxx (16 Oct 2016 14:40 UTC)
Re: [TML] Re: Daily digest for tml@simplelists.com tmr0195@xxxxxx (16 Oct 2016 15:30 UTC)
Re: [TML] Re: Daily digest for tml@simplelists.com Kelly St. Clair (16 Oct 2016 21:42 UTC)

Re: [TML] Re: Daily digest for tml@simplelists.com Kelly St. Clair 16 Oct 2016 21:41 UTC

On 10/16/2016 8:30 AM, xxxxxx@comcast.net wrote:

> In any case the party could get themselves into some very sticky
> situations or out of them.

As they say these days,
"Por que no los dos?"

--
---------------
Kelly St. Clair
xxxxxx@efn.org