Meson guns for defense Christopher Sean Hilton (13 Sep 2016 16:03 UTC)
Re: [TML] Meson guns for defense Jeffrey Schwartz (13 Sep 2016 16:11 UTC)
Re: [TML] Meson guns for defense Bruce Johnson (13 Sep 2016 18:18 UTC)
Re: [TML] Meson guns for defense Evyn MacDude (15 Sep 2016 05:30 UTC)
Re: [TML] Meson guns for defense Kelly St. Clair (15 Sep 2016 10:33 UTC)
Re: [TML] Meson guns for defense Bruce Johnson (15 Sep 2016 19:28 UTC)
Re: [TML] Meson guns for defense C. Berry (15 Sep 2016 19:54 UTC)
Re: [TML] Meson guns for defense Kenneth Barns (15 Sep 2016 22:01 UTC)
Re: [TML] Meson guns for defense W. Hopper (15 Sep 2016 22:08 UTC)
Re: [TML] Meson guns for defense C. Berry (15 Sep 2016 22:12 UTC)
Re: [TML] Meson guns for defense Kelly St. Clair (16 Sep 2016 02:03 UTC)
Re: [TML] Meson guns for defense Richard Aiken (16 Sep 2016 08:46 UTC)
Re: [TML] Meson guns for defense Jeffrey Schwartz (16 Sep 2016 00:29 UTC)
Re: [TML] Meson guns for defense shadow@xxxxxx (16 Sep 2016 03:54 UTC)
Re: [TML] Meson guns for defense Bruce Johnson (16 Sep 2016 15:46 UTC)
Re: [TML] Meson guns for defense Andrew Long (16 Sep 2016 16:23 UTC)
Re: [TML] Meson guns for defense Jeffrey Schwartz (16 Sep 2016 17:08 UTC)
Re: [TML] Meson guns for defense Bruce Johnson (16 Sep 2016 17:13 UTC)
Re: [TML] Meson guns for defense C. Berry (16 Sep 2016 17:17 UTC)
Re: [TML] Meson guns for defense C. Berry (13 Sep 2016 16:13 UTC)
Re: [TML] Meson guns for defense Peter L. Berghold (13 Sep 2016 20:13 UTC)
Re: [TML] Meson guns for defense Richard Aiken (14 Sep 2016 01:08 UTC)

Re: [TML] Meson guns for defense Andrew Long 16 Sep 2016 16:23 UTC

> On 16 Sep 2016, at 16:46, Bruce Johnson <xxxxxx@Pharmacy.Arizona.EDU> wrote:
>
>
>> On Sep 15, 2016, at 8:53 PM, (via tml list) <xxxxxx@simplelists.com> wrote:
>>
>>> If it were geothermal, that would prevent neutrino emissions that
>>> would give orbiting meson armed ships a target
>>
>> Though you'd still have to be careful about what you used as the
>> "cold" side of the setup. It needs to be significantly cooler than
>> the hot end or you won't get a lot of power.
>
> That’s what deep ocean trenches are for. In fact that’s probably the best place to put them, since you’re closer to the core there; less drilling to get to the hot stuff.  You can put your actual emplacements somewhere else, just need to drop cables for a power run to the actual emplacement.

Provided you *have* a deep ocean trench, which presupposes a fairly high Hydro percentage.

Regards, Andy

--
Andrew Long
Andrew dot Long at Mac dot com