-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is something of a side issue but, way back when, I remember that *everyone*, & every book I read, believed that Mercury was tidally locked.
Then, some years later, it was proven that Mercury was not, in fact, tidally locked.
I've never read nor heard an explanation.
Could it be that it's "on it's way" but just hasn't gotten 'there' yet?
--------------------------------------------
On Fri, 8/26/16, C. Berry <xxxxxx@gmail.com> wrote:
Subject: Re: [TML] Earth 2?
To: xxxxxx@simplelists.com
Date: Friday, August 26, 2016, 9:42 AM
Gravity
drops with the square of distance, but tidal effects drop as
the cube. So a world that close to its star is going to
"feel" proportionately much greater tidal effects
than Earth does.
Tidal
braking doesn't work by distorting the body into a
single shape. Rather, the sub- and anti-primary points
deform upward, and those 90 degrees away inward, in response
to tidal forces. But then that sub-primary bulge rotates
"ahead" of the sub-primary point, and because it
takes time to settle back, you end up with a persistent
asymmetry. The primary pulls "backward" on this
asymmetric bulge, which applies torque that slows down the
body's rotation. Eventually, the body locks into a
single orientation, with a now-permanent bulge axis aimed
through the primary. This is what happened to Luna, and
indeed to all the large moons in the solar
system.
On Fri,
Aug 26, 2016 at 9:36 AM, Christopher Sean Hilton <xxxxxx@vindaloo.com>
wrote:
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 09:09:11AM
-0700, C. Berry wrote:
> Odds are very good that this planet is tidally
locked. So climate zones
> would work very differently from how they do on a
rotating planet.
> You'd need a thick atmosphere to provide
enough heat circulation to
> keep all the air from freezing out on the
permanent night side. On
> Proxima b, I'd expect the nicest temperatures
and any extensive liquid
> water to be in the center of the day side.
>
Can someone elaborate on why the odds are good that
this planet is tidally
locked? Assume I understand a little about how tidal locking
works[1]. I'm asking
because if most singleton planets are tidally locked to
their
primaries then would you not have better chances of finding
an
earth-like experience on a gas giant moon?
[1] I assume the mechanism behind tidal locking is that
under
gravitational stress, the world stops being a sphere and
becomes more
of an ovoid. Over millions of years, gravity on the lobes of
the ovoid
exerts a torque which slows or speeds up the rotation of the
world
until it matches the period with which it orbits it's
primary.
-----
The Traveller Mailing List
Archives at http://archives.simplelists.
com/tml
Report problems to xxxxxx@simplelists.com
To unsubscribe from this list please goto
http://www.simplelists.com/
confirm.php?u= PltOdItWBSgOP4y0Q6abkGbDI1eus0 lz
--
"Eternity is in love with
the productions of time." - William
Blake
-----
The Traveller Mailing List
Archives at http://archives.simplelists.com/tml
Report problems to xxxxxx@simplelists.com
To unsubscribe from this list please goto
http://www.simplelists.com/confirm.php?u=EwREIRgLK8vaUEhNlnoNdSGKwnjoID8a