Rules Rewrite? was Re: [TML] Juno and Gas Giant Skimming
Phil Pugliese 06 Jul 2016 12:03 UTC
--------------------------------------------
On Tue, 7/5/16, Kelly St. Clair <xxxxxx@efn.org> wrote:
Subject: Re: [TML] Juno and Gas Giant Skimming
To: xxxxxx@simplelists.com
Date: Tuesday, July 5, 2016, 11:38 AM
On 7/5/2016 8:27 AM,
Jeffrey Schwartz wrote:
> And that got me thinking this morning
about gas giants, magnetic
> fields,
radiation, and debris.
>
>>From the descriptions of Jupiter's
environment is, fuel skimming
> sounds a
_lot_ more exciting than the rules imply it is. That, or
the
> comment someone made a while back
about mishap on 7+ is a good rule.
Easy answer: the LBBs were written before the
Voyagers got a good close
look at Jupiter,
and thus, before most people really knew /anything/
about it besides what Galileo et al had
observed. Not quite "Venus is a
swampy jungle", but close.
This leaves us with the same
dilemma we've faced again and again: do we
rewrite the rules to reflect what we've
learned and done and invented
since 1980,
or leave them as they are, covered in zeerust?
-- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hasn't that already been done, like five times? ;-p