Juno and Gas Giant Skimming
Jeffrey Schwartz
(05 Jul 2016 15:28 UTC)
|
||
Re: [TML] Juno and Gas Giant Skimming
Kelly St. Clair
(05 Jul 2016 18:38 UTC)
|
||
Re: [TML] Juno and Gas Giant Skimming
shadow@xxxxxx
(05 Jul 2016 23:28 UTC)
|
||
Re: [TML] Juno and Gas Giant Skimming
Alex Goodwin
(05 Jul 2016 20:04 UTC)
|
||
Re: [TML] Juno and Gas Giant Skimming
C. Berry
(05 Jul 2016 21:12 UTC)
|
||
Re: [TML] Juno and Gas Giant Skimming
Richard Aiken
(06 Jul 2016 04:23 UTC)
|
||
Re: [TML] Juno and Gas Giant Skimming
Andrew Long
(06 Jul 2016 16:13 UTC)
|
||
(missing)
|
||
(missing)
|
||
(missing)
|
||
(missing)
|
||
(missing)
|
||
(missing)
|
||
(missing)
|
||
(missing)
|
||
(missing)
|
||
(missing)
|
||
Re: [TML] Juno and Gas Giant Skimming
Richard Aiken
(06 Jul 2016 20:06 UTC)
|
||
Re: [TML] Juno and Gas Giant Skimming
Andrew Long
(06 Jul 2016 21:25 UTC)
|
||
Re: [TML] Juno and Gas Giant Skimming
shadow@xxxxxx
(06 Jul 2016 19:51 UTC)
|
||
Re: [TML] Juno and Gas Giant Skimming
shadow@xxxxxx
(05 Jul 2016 23:28 UTC)
|
||
Re: [TML] Juno and Gas Giant Skimming
Tim
(06 Jul 2016 01:06 UTC)
|
||
Re: [TML] Juno and Gas Giant Skimming Tim (06 Jul 2016 00:33 UTC)
|
On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 11:27:30AM -0400, Jeffrey Schwartz wrote: > The other thought that came to mind is that for a gravitic-capable > spacecraft, the options would be different. > You could approach from over the pole, like Juno did... and brake to a > stop, then slowly drop into the polar atmo and leave. You don't need > to make orbit so long as you have contragrav or enough thrust to hover > and break away. > > What's the flight profile in your TU for skimming ? Mostly, gathering water/ice from gas giant moons. In the very rare occasions where a trip into a gas giant atmosphere is required, pretty much what you said: drop in on contragrav and thrusters at very much suborbital speeds. Going in hot at orbital velocity is generally considered an awful idea due to the hull damage that results. The temperatures associated with atmospheric entry at more than 40 km/s are insanely high; rather a lot higher than those created by Traveller's starship laser weapons. So any ship surviving such a sustained plasma blast is at best going to come out with less thickness of hull than it went in with, and looking much worse for wear. - Tim