Juno and Gas Giant Skimming
Jeffrey Schwartz
(05 Jul 2016 15:28 UTC)
|
||
Re: [TML] Juno and Gas Giant Skimming Kelly St. Clair (05 Jul 2016 18:38 UTC)
|
||
Re: [TML] Juno and Gas Giant Skimming
shadow@xxxxxx
(05 Jul 2016 23:28 UTC)
|
||
Re: [TML] Juno and Gas Giant Skimming
Alex Goodwin
(05 Jul 2016 20:04 UTC)
|
||
Re: [TML] Juno and Gas Giant Skimming
C. Berry
(05 Jul 2016 21:12 UTC)
|
||
Re: [TML] Juno and Gas Giant Skimming
Richard Aiken
(06 Jul 2016 04:23 UTC)
|
||
Re: [TML] Juno and Gas Giant Skimming
Andrew Long
(06 Jul 2016 16:13 UTC)
|
||
(missing)
|
||
(missing)
|
||
(missing)
|
||
(missing)
|
||
(missing)
|
||
(missing)
|
||
(missing)
|
||
(missing)
|
||
(missing)
|
||
(missing)
|
||
Re: [TML] Juno and Gas Giant Skimming
Richard Aiken
(06 Jul 2016 20:06 UTC)
|
||
Re: [TML] Juno and Gas Giant Skimming
Andrew Long
(06 Jul 2016 21:25 UTC)
|
||
Re: [TML] Juno and Gas Giant Skimming
shadow@xxxxxx
(06 Jul 2016 19:51 UTC)
|
||
Re: [TML] Juno and Gas Giant Skimming
shadow@xxxxxx
(05 Jul 2016 23:28 UTC)
|
||
Re: [TML] Juno and Gas Giant Skimming
Tim
(06 Jul 2016 01:06 UTC)
|
||
Re: [TML] Juno and Gas Giant Skimming
Tim
(06 Jul 2016 00:33 UTC)
|
On 7/5/2016 8:27 AM, Jeffrey Schwartz wrote: > And that got me thinking this morning about gas giants, magnetic > fields, radiation, and debris. > >>From the descriptions of Jupiter's environment is, fuel skimming > sounds a _lot_ more exciting than the rules imply it is. That, or the > comment someone made a while back about mishap on 7+ is a good rule. Easy answer: the LBBs were written before the Voyagers got a good close look at Jupiter, and thus, before most people really knew /anything/ about it besides what Galileo et al had observed. Not quite "Venus is a swampy jungle", but close. This leaves us with the same dilemma we've faced again and again: do we rewrite the rules to reflect what we've learned and done and invented since 1980, or leave them as they are, covered in zeerust? -- --------------- Kelly St. Clair xxxxxx@efn.org