Juno and Gas Giant Skimming Jeffrey Schwartz (05 Jul 2016 15:28 UTC)
Re: [TML] Juno and Gas Giant Skimming Kelly St. Clair (05 Jul 2016 18:38 UTC)
Re: [TML] Juno and Gas Giant Skimming shadow@xxxxxx (05 Jul 2016 23:28 UTC)
Re: [TML] Juno and Gas Giant Skimming Alex Goodwin (05 Jul 2016 20:04 UTC)
Re: [TML] Juno and Gas Giant Skimming C. Berry (05 Jul 2016 21:12 UTC)
Re: [TML] Juno and Gas Giant Skimming Richard Aiken (06 Jul 2016 04:23 UTC)
Re: [TML] Juno and Gas Giant Skimming Andrew Long (06 Jul 2016 16:13 UTC)
(missing)
(missing)
(missing)
(missing)
(missing)
(missing)
(missing)
(missing)
(missing)
(missing)
Re: [TML] Juno and Gas Giant Skimming Richard Aiken (06 Jul 2016 20:06 UTC)
Re: [TML] Juno and Gas Giant Skimming Andrew Long (06 Jul 2016 21:25 UTC)
Re: [TML] Juno and Gas Giant Skimming shadow@xxxxxx (06 Jul 2016 19:51 UTC)
Re: [TML] Juno and Gas Giant Skimming shadow@xxxxxx (05 Jul 2016 23:28 UTC)
Re: [TML] Juno and Gas Giant Skimming Tim (06 Jul 2016 01:06 UTC)
Re: [TML] Juno and Gas Giant Skimming Tim (06 Jul 2016 00:33 UTC)

Re: [TML] Juno and Gas Giant Skimming Kelly St. Clair 05 Jul 2016 18:38 UTC

On 7/5/2016 8:27 AM, Jeffrey Schwartz wrote:

> And that got me thinking this morning about gas giants, magnetic
> fields, radiation, and debris.
>
>>From the descriptions of Jupiter's environment is, fuel skimming
> sounds a _lot_ more exciting than the rules imply it is.  That, or the
> comment someone made a while back about mishap on 7+ is a good rule.

Easy answer:  the LBBs were written before the Voyagers got a good close
look at Jupiter, and thus, before most people really knew /anything/
about it besides what Galileo et al had observed.  Not quite "Venus is a
swampy jungle", but close.

This leaves us with the same dilemma we've faced again and again:  do we
rewrite the rules to reflect what we've learned and done and invented
since 1980, or leave them as they are, covered in zeerust?

--
---------------
Kelly St. Clair
xxxxxx@efn.org