--------------------------------------------
On Tue, 5/24/16, (via tml list) <xxxxxx@simplelists.com> wrote:

 Subject: Re: Multi Jumping is no big deal since LBB5v1, was Re: Incredibly efficient! was Re: [TML] L-Hyd not necessary for jumping & mi
 To: xxxxxx@simplelists.com
 Date: Tuesday, May 24, 2016, 10:36 PM

 This email was sent from
 shadowgard.com which does not allow forwarding of emails via
 email lists. Therefore the sender's email address (xxxxxx@shadowgard.com)
 has been replaced with a dummy one. The original message
 follows:

 On 24 May 2016 at 0:15, Phil Pugliese (via tml list) wrote:

 > How far would you have to be travelling in order to
 require, let's say
 > it's the standard 'scout ship', a two-week constant 2G
 accell (towards
 > the 'target'), a coasting time of one week, & then
 a two-week decell
 > in order to arrive w/ only a small relative diff in
 velocity?

 If you have jump drive you'd never do this unless you
 *wanted* to
 waste a month for some reason. Because you can do it in a
 week by
 using the jump drive.

 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I never really liked 'microjumps' so I never used them.

As I recall, in CT, J1 was the least a ship could go.
(BTW, was 'microJ' introduced in CT, or was it part of MT?)

So, I was thinking of a jaunt out to a 'Neptune-equiv' distance, or maybe even beyond Pluto, as part of an adventure.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------