Hivers manipulating Hivers? was Re: K'kree vs Hiver, was Re: [TML] GMing Manipulations
Phil Pugliese 16 May 2016 22:39 UTC
--------------------------------------------
On Mon, 5/16/16, Jeffrey Schwartz <xxxxxx@gmail.com> wrote:
Subject: Re: K'kree vs Hiver, was Re: [TML] GMing Manipulations
To: "tml" <xxxxxx@simplelists.com>
Date: Monday, May 16, 2016, 11:17 AM
On Mon, May 16, 2016 at
11:21 AM, Phil Pugliese (via tml list)
<xxxxxx@simplelists.com>
wrote:
> This email was sent from
yahoo.com which does not allow forwarding of emails via
email lists. Therefore the sender's email address (xxxxxx@yahoo.com)
has been replaced with a dummy one. The original message
follows:
>
>
In theory, no one reads
> the
"sealed" registered manipulations until after
> the
> registration
Hiver unveils the
> conclusion of their
master work. Canon is silent
> on what
happens with the ongoing and failed
>
manipulations.
>
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> I can see it now;
>
> "Hey that
pompous fool 'what-iz-name' just kicked the bucket!
His 'club' should be unsealing all his "works
in progress". Let's go see what that incompetent
jackass was up to for all these years."
>
>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I can picture the
"pompous fool" having some plan in his
portfolio
that starts with : "First,
convince the entire club that I'm a pompous
fool"
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
In that case he'd have achieved the success of a post-mortem Manipulation!
I wonder if various Hiver factions are running Manipulations on each other?
WOW! Think of all the possibilities?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------