Re: K'kree vs Hiver, was Re: [TML] GMing Manipulations Phil Pugliese 15 May 2016 18:16 UTC

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

But..... What the clubs *compete* against each other?
Sorta' like what is seen 'tween IvyLeague schools?
Or perhaps more seriously?

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On Sun, 5/15/16, Richard Aiken <xxxxxx@gmail.com> wrote:

 Subject: Re: K'kree vs Hiver, was Re: [TML] GMing Manipulations
 To: "tml" <xxxxxx@simplelists.com>
 Date: Sunday, May 15, 2016, 10:21 AM

 The Hivers
 do - sorta - centrally coordinate manipulations. In order to
 be recognized as a manipulation, the effort has to be
 registered in advance with one of the Manipulation Clubs.
 Presumably, these coordinate their records with one another.
 Therefore, it would be possible - at least after the fact -
 to track the various correlations and cross-corelations.
 On May 15, 2016 11:17
 AM, "Thomas Jones-Low" <xxxxxx@gmail.com>
 wrote:
 On
 5/15/2016 9:52 AM, Grimmund wrote:

 On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 7:13 AM, Thomas Jones-Low <xxxxxx@gmail.com

 <mailto:xxxxxx@gmail.com>>
 wrote:

     2) The K'kree reject the Hiver peace treaty. The
 upgraded Hiver navy begins

     reconquer the Hiver border worlds, then advanced into
 K'kree space. Their

     sense of parental caring toward the K'kree client
 races pushes them to

     conquer the whole of K'kree space. And the
 K'kree become just another

     Federation member.

 Multiple hiver manipulators bid on "manipulation
 rights" to individual K'Kree

 planets (or continents, or settlements) with an overall goal
 of 'civilizing' the

 K'Kree, manipulating them toward tolerance of others and
 reducing their cultural

 tendency to stomp anything threatening.

         This is the thing I've never seen. The Hiver
 don't have a centralized (or even decentralized)
 coordination point for their Manipulations. So if you have
 5000 potential manipulators all attempting to prove their
 latest theory of social change, do the effect cancel or
 amplify?

         I'm guessing that in most cases the effect
 cancel. The effort of the Manipulator generates a minor,
 localized change with some improvements. Enough to provide
 the much sought after "Manipulator" title. But not
 enough to effect a sweeping wide area change.

         On the other hand, if you have all N of them
 working toward a similar goal, even if the details differ,
 there are going to be unintended consequences.

         I have no doubt that over the last 3000 years
 the Hiver have been doing exactly that. The question is, to
 what effect? The K'kree haven't restarted the war.
 They still hate/fear G'nakk, but not enough to gather a
 huge fleet and go on a sector wide stomping expedition. This
 counts as a success, in some definition of success. From the
 Hiver perspective, problem solved.

         The K'kree perspective is, of course, wildly
 different. But they don't talk about it with
 strangers.

 --

         Thomas Jones-Low

 Work:   xxxxxx@softstart.com

 Home:   xxxxxx@gmail.com

 -----

 The Traveller Mailing List

 Archives at http://archives.simplelists.com/tml

 Report problems to xxxxxx@simplelists.com

 To unsubscribe from this list please goto http://archives.simplelists.com

 -----
 The Traveller Mailing List
 Archives at http://archives.simplelists.com/tml
 Report problems to xxxxxx@simplelists.com
 To unsubscribe from this list please goto
 http://www.simplelists.com/confirm.php?u=EwREIRgLK8vaUEhNlnoNdSGKwnjoID8a