Re: K'kree vs Hiver, was Re: [TML] GMing Manipulations
Phil Pugliese 12 May 2016 16:34 UTC
--------------------------------------------
On Thu, 5/12/16, Richard Aiken <xxxxxx@gmail.com> wrote:
Subject: Re: K'kree vs Hiver, was Re: [TML] GMing Manipulations
To: "tml" <xxxxxx@simplelists.com>
Date: Thursday, May 12, 2016, 9:11 AM
(Someone Whose ID I
Accidentally Deleted Wrote): "I've always wondered
why (the K'kree) didn't also redouble their efforts
to wipe out the other 'threat' (hivers) that created
the first one."
I thought that went without saying; the
K'kree had ZERO desire to discover what ELSE the Hivers
had ready to deploy, in the event that their demands were
not met.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Yeah, but that sounds a little too 'pat' for my taste.
Not to mention a little wimpy. Esp for a race as militant as the K'kree.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------