Re: Hulls aren't *that* fragile, was Gaussbow? was [TML] The Anachronistic Future Phil Pugliese 07 May 2016 16:02 UTC

--------------------------------------------
On Fri, 5/6/16, Bruce Johnson <xxxxxx@Pharmacy.Arizona.EDU> wrote:

 Subject: Re: Hulls aren't *that* fragile, was Gaussbow? was [TML] The Anachronistic Future
 To: "xxxxxx@simplelists.com" <xxxxxx@simplelists.com>
 Date: Friday, May 6, 2016, 1:35 PM

 > On
 May 6, 2016, at 11:55 AM, Richard Aiken <xxxxxx@gmail.com>
 wrote:
 >
 > For some
 reason, the copy I got of this post came through posiitvely
 SATURATED with text-coding symbols . . .

 I think Carlos’ email client
 went kablooey all over the message. Looks like it was an
 html mail minus the part that tells the end clients it’s
 html.

 -- --------------------------------------------------------------------------

Also, I far as I could tell,  there was no new content either.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------