Re: Hulls aren't *that* fragile, was Gaussbow? was [TML] The Anachronistic Future
Phil Pugliese 07 May 2016 16:02 UTC
--------------------------------------------
On Fri, 5/6/16, Bruce Johnson <xxxxxx@Pharmacy.Arizona.EDU> wrote:
Subject: Re: Hulls aren't *that* fragile, was Gaussbow? was [TML] The Anachronistic Future
To: "xxxxxx@simplelists.com" <xxxxxx@simplelists.com>
Date: Friday, May 6, 2016, 1:35 PM
> On
May 6, 2016, at 11:55 AM, Richard Aiken <xxxxxx@gmail.com>
wrote:
>
> For some
reason, the copy I got of this post came through posiitvely
SATURATED with text-coding symbols . . .
I think Carlos’ email client
went kablooey all over the message. Looks like it was an
html mail minus the part that tells the end clients it’s
html.
-- --------------------------------------------------------------------------
Also, I far as I could tell, there was no new content either.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------