test shadowgard.com shadow@xxxxxx (29 Apr 2016 18:44 UTC)
Re: [TML] test shadowgard.com tmr0195@xxxxxx (29 Apr 2016 21:19 UTC)
Re: [TML] test shadowgard.com Richard Aiken (29 Apr 2016 22:14 UTC)
Re: [TML] test shadowgard.com shadow@xxxxxx (30 Apr 2016 15:12 UTC)
Re: [TML] test shadowgard.com Bruce Johnson (30 Apr 2016 21:17 UTC)
Re: [TML] test shadowgard.com Freelance Traveller (29 Apr 2016 23:07 UTC)
Re: [TML] test shadowgard.com shadow@xxxxxx (30 Apr 2016 15:12 UTC)

Re: [TML] test shadowgard.com shadow@xxxxxx 30 Apr 2016 15:11 UTC

On 29 Apr 2016 at 17:14, Richard Aiken wrote:

>
> I got a big yellow box (from Google?) asking me the (rhetorical?)
> question, "Why is this message in spam?" then answering itself with,
> "It comes from shadowgard.com but fails shadowgard.com 's tests." . .
> . or words to this effect (I'm on my phone and don't know how to cut
> and paste with it).

Yep, that's what I've been telling Bruce. The list has to munge *all*
From addresses to avoid that sort of thing happening.

If it's doing that to me, it's *deleting* messages from users on
sites that have "delete" as their dmarc policy.

--
Leonard Erickson (aka shadow)
shadow at shadowgard dot com