Detecting Nuclear Detonations Kurt Feltenberger (06 Apr 2016 21:47 UTC)
Re: [TML] Detecting Nuclear Detonations Bruce Johnson (06 Apr 2016 22:29 UTC)
Re: [TML] Detecting Nuclear Detonations Postmark (06 Apr 2016 22:31 UTC)
Re: [TML] Detecting Nuclear Detonations Craig Berry (06 Apr 2016 22:37 UTC)
Re: [TML] Detecting Nuclear Detonations Bruce Johnson (06 Apr 2016 22:50 UTC)
Re: [TML] Detecting Nuclear Detonations Craig Berry (06 Apr 2016 22:56 UTC)
Re: [TML] Detecting Nuclear Detonations Kelly St. Clair (07 Apr 2016 00:30 UTC)
Re: [TML] Detecting Nuclear Detonations Kurt Feltenberger (07 Apr 2016 01:09 UTC)
Re: [TML] Detecting Nuclear Detonations Grimmund (07 Apr 2016 12:59 UTC)
Re: [TML] Detecting Nuclear Detonations Bruce Johnson (06 Apr 2016 22:43 UTC)
Re: [TML] Detecting Nuclear Detonations Tim (07 Apr 2016 02:50 UTC)
Re: [TML] Detecting Nuclear Detonations Michael McKinney (07 Apr 2016 13:02 UTC)
Re: [TML] Detecting Nuclear Detonations Orffen (07 Apr 2016 21:31 UTC)
Re: [TML] Detecting Nuclear Detonations Craig Berry (07 Apr 2016 21:37 UTC)
Re: [TML] Detecting Nuclear Detonations Andrew Long (07 Apr 2016 21:45 UTC)
Re: [TML] Detecting Nuclear Detonations Craig Berry (07 Apr 2016 21:53 UTC)
Re: [TML] Detecting Nuclear Detonations Michael McKinney (08 Apr 2016 04:26 UTC)
Re: [TML] Detecting Nuclear Detonations shadow@xxxxxx (08 Apr 2016 00:18 UTC)
Re: [TML] Detecting Nuclear Detonations Richard Aiken (09 Apr 2016 02:47 UTC)

Re: [TML] Detecting Nuclear Detonations Postmark 06 Apr 2016 22:31 UTC

On 6 Apr 2016, at 22:46, Kurt Feltenberger <xxxxxx@thepaw.org> wrote:
>
> This question touches on the known and theoretical...
>
> Are there any particles or emissions, however faint, known or theorized, that would allow a sufficiently sensitive sensor to detect a nuclear detonation (actually, enough to destroy all civilization on a world of ~7+ billion people in a day) at interstellar distances either as it happened or within a short (less than a week or so) period of time?
>
> My gut says no, but with mesons and other goodies that are on the bleeding edge, I figured I'd ask and see what the hive has to say.

I think that there are two grounds for saying no:

Firstly, no non-FTL particle is going to reach the next star in less than a year or so.

Secondly, even global thermonuclear war is dull next to the output of a star.

Phil Kitching