Re: [TML] Relic tech and Scarcity-Driven Imperium (was: Salvage Operations (and Submarines))
Phil Pugliese 28 Mar 2016 18:53 UTC
--------------------------------------------
On Mon, 3/28/16, Bruce Johnson <xxxxxx@Pharmacy.Arizona.EDU> wrote:
Subject: Re: [TML] Relic tech and Scarcity-Driven Imperium (was: Salvage Operations (and Submarines))
To: "xxxxxx@simplelists.com" <xxxxxx@simplelists.com>
Date: Monday, March 28, 2016, 11:21 AM
A TU that doesn’t have much trade has no need
for an Imperial Navy, or an Imperium, as such.
You cannot have both a
universe where PC's have a Type A far trader, that Far
Trader is the standard mode of interstellar trade and an
Imperial Navy patrolling a couple thousand subsectors.
The economics simply don’t
make any sense at all. A low-trade TU cannot generate
sufficient taxes to sustain such an Imperial Navy. Certainly
not one with Tigress battleships and the like.
You can HAVE such a TU, it
just won’t have internal consistency.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
OTOH, I don't think you must have the humungous Bulk Carriers introduced w/ MT in order to have Tigresses, etc.
Commercial merchant ships up to 20k DT from CT would be sufficient.
That would, IMO, be more like the 18th century than the post-container cargo ship contemporary world.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------