What If No Meson/PA Spinal Or Bay Weapons? Kurt Feltenberger (04 Mar 2016 22:47 UTC)
Re: [TML] What If No Meson/PA Spinal Or Bay Weapons? Richard Aiken (05 Mar 2016 00:02 UTC)
Re: [TML] What If No Meson/PA Spinal Or Bay Weapons? Richard Aiken (12 Mar 2016 23:20 UTC)
Re: [TML] What If No Meson/PA Spinal Or Bay Weapons? Ethan McKinney (13 Mar 2016 05:44 UTC)
Re: [TML] What If No Meson/PA Spinal Or Bay Weapons? Richard Aiken (13 Mar 2016 13:03 UTC)
Re: [TML] What If No Meson/PA Spinal Or Bay Weapons? Kelly St. Clair (13 Mar 2016 14:37 UTC)
Re: [TML] What If No Meson/PA Spinal Or Bay Weapons? Richard Aiken (14 Mar 2016 04:34 UTC)
Re: [TML] What If No Meson/PA Spinal Or Bay Weapons? Edward Swatschek (14 Mar 2016 12:33 UTC)
Re: [TML] What If No Meson/PA Spinal Or Bay Weapons? Grimmund (14 Mar 2016 12:51 UTC)
Re: [TML] What If No Meson/PA Spinal Or Bay Weapons? Richard Aiken (15 Mar 2016 02:08 UTC)
Re: [TML] What If No Meson/PA Spinal Or Bay Weapons? Kelly St. Clair (15 Mar 2016 04:52 UTC)
Re: [TML] What If No Meson/PA Spinal Or Bay Weapons? Bruce Johnson (15 Mar 2016 16:16 UTC)
Re: [TML] What If No Meson/PA Spinal Or Bay Weapons? Bruce Johnson (15 Mar 2016 16:42 UTC)
Re: [TML] What If No Meson/PA Spinal Or Bay Weapons? Richard Aiken (16 Mar 2016 05:16 UTC)
Re: [TML] What If No Meson/PA Spinal Or Bay Weapons? Grimmund (16 Mar 2016 15:03 UTC)
Re: [TML] What If No Meson/PA Spinal Or Bay Weapons? Richard Aiken (16 Mar 2016 20:32 UTC)
Re: [TML] What If No Meson/PA Spinal Or Bay Weapons? Bruce Johnson (15 Mar 2016 16:03 UTC)
Re: [TML] What If No Meson/PA Spinal Or Bay Weapons? tmr0195@xxxxxx (13 Mar 2016 06:19 UTC)
Re: [TML] What If No Meson/PA Spinal Or Bay Weapons? Richard Aiken (13 Mar 2016 13:12 UTC)
Re: [TML] What If No Meson/PA Spinal Or Bay Weapons? tmr0195@xxxxxx (13 Mar 2016 15:06 UTC)
Re: [TML] What If No Meson/PA Spinal Or Bay Weapons? Evyn MacDude (05 Mar 2016 21:18 UTC)
Re: [TML] What If No Meson/PA Spinal Or Bay Weapons? Edward Swatschek (14 Mar 2016 12:57 UTC)

Re: [TML] What If No Meson/PA Spinal Or Bay Weapons? Bruce Johnson 15 Mar 2016 16:03 UTC

> On Mar 14, 2016, at 7:08 PM, Richard Aiken <xxxxxx@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> 3) A centralized installation in a capital ship designed with an eye to engaging multiple smaller opponents armed with lighter weapons prevents "scrubbing" of the capital ship's exterior from affecting it's missile capability significantly. All damage control has to do is clear any blockage (even if this means blasting away parts of intervening decks) and the capital ship can resume dispensing its undiminished stock of missiles.
>
> On the other hand, a centralized magazine can be a net disadvantage when facing something armed with weapons capable of deep penetration, since a hit could possibly trigger a chain-reaction magazine detonation. But then again, the OP is supposing a *lack* of such heavy weapons to begin with, so that point shouldn't concern us.
>

Just be careful where you place your reactor core vents :-)

--
Bruce Johnson
University of Arizona
College of Pharmacy
Information Technology Group

Institutions do not have opinions, merely customs