Salvage Operations
Knapp
(20 Feb 2016 11:27 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Salvage Operations
Richard Aiken
(20 Feb 2016 11:43 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Salvage Operations
Richard Aiken
(20 Feb 2016 11:44 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Salvage Operations
Knapp
(20 Feb 2016 13:01 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Salvage Operations
shadow@xxxxxx
(21 Feb 2016 05:32 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Salvage Operations
Bruce Johnson
(21 Feb 2016 20:50 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Salvage Operations
Craig Berry
(21 Feb 2016 20:56 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Salvage Operations
Knapp
(21 Feb 2016 22:02 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Salvage Operations
Craig Berry
(21 Feb 2016 22:09 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Salvage Operations
Knapp
(21 Feb 2016 22:12 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Salvage Operations Tim (22 Feb 2016 05:11 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Salvage Operations
Knapp
(22 Feb 2016 12:36 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Salvage Operations (and Submarines)
carlos.web@xxxxxx
(22 Feb 2016 20:34 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Salvage Operations (and Submarines)
Richard Aiken
(22 Feb 2016 22:00 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Salvage Operations (and Submarines)
tmr0195@xxxxxx
(22 Feb 2016 22:04 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Salvage Operations (and Submarines)
Richard Aiken
(22 Feb 2016 22:05 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Salvage Operations (and Submarines)
Greg Chalik
(23 Feb 2016 08:45 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Salvage Operations (and Submarines)
Bruce Johnson
(23 Feb 2016 18:00 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Salvage Operations (and Submarines)
Greg Chalik
(23 Feb 2016 20:38 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Salvage Operations
Richard Aiken
(22 Feb 2016 21:55 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Salvage Operations
Craig Berry
(22 Feb 2016 22:03 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Salvage Operations
Bruce Johnson
(22 Feb 2016 22:04 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Salvage Operations
Richard Aiken
(22 Feb 2016 22:16 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Salvage Operations
tmr0195@xxxxxx
(22 Feb 2016 22:19 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Salvage Operations
Richard Aiken
(22 Feb 2016 23:16 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Salvage Operations
Greg Chalik
(23 Feb 2016 08:24 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Salvage Operations
Craig Berry
(24 Feb 2016 17:37 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Salvage Operations
Tim
(22 Feb 2016 23:33 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Salvage Operations
Greg Chalik
(23 Feb 2016 08:35 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Salvage Operations
Tim
(23 Feb 2016 09:52 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Salvage Operations
Greg Chalik
(23 Feb 2016 09:56 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Salvage Operations
Richard Aiken
(24 Feb 2016 08:12 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Salvage Operations
Tim
(22 Feb 2016 05:15 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Salvage Operations
Tim
(21 Feb 2016 00:30 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Salvage Operations
Richard Aiken
(21 Feb 2016 03:28 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Salvage Operations
shadow@xxxxxx
(21 Feb 2016 05:32 UTC)
|
On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 11:02:31PM +0100, Knapp wrote: > Yes, I was thinking of having the sensors all over a few parsecs. A > lot like hunting for wrecks nowadays. They don't expect to find a > lot or often and it does take some luck and a lot of investment > before hand. Bruce, I am not sure if you were pro or anti idea with > your Webb statement. The main argument against is the canonical price for sensor systems vs salvage value of starships, which would make it wildly uneconomical. However, perhaps canonical prices only apply to starships, and zero-gee installations can do it at similar cost for 1000x the performance. That's not entirely unreasonable, since starship sensors have to be extremely rugged and compact by comparison. At that price range for deep space installations, it starts to become feasible. - Tim