Salvage Operations
Knapp
(20 Feb 2016 11:27 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Salvage Operations
Richard Aiken
(20 Feb 2016 11:43 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Salvage Operations
Richard Aiken
(20 Feb 2016 11:44 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Salvage Operations
Knapp
(20 Feb 2016 13:01 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Salvage Operations
shadow@xxxxxx
(21 Feb 2016 05:32 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Salvage Operations
Tim
(21 Feb 2016 00:30 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Salvage Operations
Richard Aiken
(21 Feb 2016 03:28 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Salvage Operations shadow@xxxxxx (21 Feb 2016 05:32 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Salvage Operations
Bruce Johnson
(21 Feb 2016 20:50 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Salvage Operations
Craig Berry
(21 Feb 2016 20:56 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Salvage Operations
Knapp
(21 Feb 2016 22:02 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Salvage Operations
Craig Berry
(21 Feb 2016 22:09 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Salvage Operations
Knapp
(21 Feb 2016 22:12 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Salvage Operations
Tim
(22 Feb 2016 05:11 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Salvage Operations
Knapp
(22 Feb 2016 12:36 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Salvage Operations (and Submarines)
carlos.web@xxxxxx
(22 Feb 2016 20:34 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Salvage Operations (and Submarines)
Richard Aiken
(22 Feb 2016 22:00 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Salvage Operations (and Submarines)
tmr0195@xxxxxx
(22 Feb 2016 22:04 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Salvage Operations (and Submarines)
Richard Aiken
(22 Feb 2016 22:05 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Salvage Operations (and Submarines)
Greg Chalik
(23 Feb 2016 08:45 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Salvage Operations (and Submarines)
Bruce Johnson
(23 Feb 2016 18:00 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Salvage Operations (and Submarines)
Greg Chalik
(23 Feb 2016 20:38 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Salvage Operations
Richard Aiken
(22 Feb 2016 21:55 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Salvage Operations
Craig Berry
(22 Feb 2016 22:03 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Salvage Operations
Bruce Johnson
(22 Feb 2016 22:04 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Salvage Operations
Richard Aiken
(22 Feb 2016 22:16 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Salvage Operations
tmr0195@xxxxxx
(22 Feb 2016 22:19 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Salvage Operations
Richard Aiken
(22 Feb 2016 23:16 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Salvage Operations
Greg Chalik
(23 Feb 2016 08:24 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Salvage Operations
Craig Berry
(24 Feb 2016 17:37 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Salvage Operations
Tim
(22 Feb 2016 23:33 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Salvage Operations
Greg Chalik
(23 Feb 2016 08:35 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Salvage Operations
Tim
(23 Feb 2016 09:52 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Salvage Operations
Greg Chalik
(23 Feb 2016 09:56 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Salvage Operations
Richard Aiken
(24 Feb 2016 08:12 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Salvage Operations
Tim
(22 Feb 2016 05:15 UTC)
|
On 20 Feb 2016 at 12:27, Knapp wrote: > I got to thinking that if you want to run a misjump salvage operation > you should go to where the ships are jumping a lot and then around > this area set up a bunch of satellites that watch for jump flashes in > the wrong place, like deep space. Once you get a couple of flashes > from 3 points then you can triangulate where the ship landed. You > know that the flash is at least a couple of hundred years old, light > speed, so it should be people free. Except it's going to be *really* hard to see a jump flash from several sectors away (as that "several hundred years" bit would require). > So a normal day is jumping from satellite to satellite collecting the > data and hoping for a hit. Naturally one points flash would be much > latter than the next points flash data if the point is not between > the two points but over time you should get hits. A bit like looking > for sunken ships in hopes of finding the gold. You could also amass > all the lost ship reports from the last 1000 years or so. Given that jumps take a week, that wouldn't be a "normal day". It'd be a several months. Also, again with the "several hundred years" bit, you'd need observations from several parsecs apart to triangulate properly. -- Leonard Erickson (aka shadow) shadow at shadowgard dot com