Understanding World Domination. Knapp (01 Feb 2016 13:30 UTC)
Re: [TML] Understanding World Domination. Neil Mahoney (01 Feb 2016 14:10 UTC)
Re: [TML] Understanding World Domination. Knapp (01 Feb 2016 14:29 UTC)
Re: [TML] Understanding World Domination. Kelly St. Clair (01 Feb 2016 15:21 UTC)
Re: [TML] Understanding World Domination. Knapp (01 Feb 2016 15:48 UTC)
Re: [TML] Understanding World Domination. Bruce Johnson (01 Feb 2016 15:30 UTC)
Re: [TML] Understanding World Domination. Knapp (01 Feb 2016 15:51 UTC)
Re: [TML] Understanding World Domination. Bruce Johnson (01 Feb 2016 16:04 UTC)
Re: [TML] Understanding World Domination. shadow@xxxxxx (02 Feb 2016 19:29 UTC)
Re: [TML] Understanding World Domination. carlos.web@xxxxxx (01 Feb 2016 17:18 UTC)
Re: [TML] Understanding World Domination. Bruce Johnson (01 Feb 2016 18:06 UTC)
Re: [TML] Understanding World Domination. Traveller (01 Feb 2016 18:58 UTC)
Re: [TML] Understanding World Domination. Knapp (01 Feb 2016 20:20 UTC)
Re: [TML] Understanding World Domination. Richard Aiken (03 Feb 2016 13:44 UTC)
Re: [TML] Understanding World Domination. tmr0195@xxxxxx (01 Feb 2016 22:55 UTC)
Re: [TML] Understanding World Domination. carlos.web@xxxxxx (02 Feb 2016 18:51 UTC)
Re: [TML] Understanding World Domination. tmr0195@xxxxxx (02 Feb 2016 19:56 UTC)
Re: [TML] Understanding World Domination. Greg Chalik (02 Feb 2016 20:36 UTC)
Re: [TML] Understanding World Domination. Bruce Johnson (02 Feb 2016 21:20 UTC)
Re: [TML] Understanding World Domination. Knapp (02 Feb 2016 21:36 UTC)
Re: [TML] Understanding World Domination. Greg Chalik (03 Feb 2016 04:32 UTC)
Re: [TML] Understanding World Domination. Bruce Johnson (02 Feb 2016 20:33 UTC)
Re: [TML] Understanding World Domination. Knapp (02 Feb 2016 21:23 UTC)
Re: [TML] Understanding World Domination. tmr0195@xxxxxx (03 Feb 2016 15:32 UTC)
Re: [TML] Understanding World Domination. carlos.web@xxxxxx (04 Feb 2016 12:54 UTC)
Re: [TML] Understanding World Domination. tmr0195@xxxxxx (04 Feb 2016 14:11 UTC)
Re: [TML] Understanding World Domination. Richard Aiken (04 Feb 2016 01:31 UTC)
Re: [TML] Understanding World Domination. carlos.web@xxxxxx (04 Feb 2016 13:11 UTC)
Re: [TML] Understanding World Domination. Greg Chalik (01 Feb 2016 20:35 UTC)
Re: [TML] Understanding World Domination. Tim (02 Feb 2016 02:00 UTC)
Re: [TML] Understanding World Domination. Greg Chalik (02 Feb 2016 04:00 UTC)
Re: [TML] Understanding World Domination. Knapp (02 Feb 2016 21:17 UTC)
Re: [TML] Understanding World Domination. Knapp (02 Feb 2016 21:15 UTC)
Re: [TML] Understanding World Domination. Tim (02 Feb 2016 23:52 UTC)
Re: [TML] Understanding World Domination. Greg Chalik (03 Feb 2016 04:39 UTC)
Re: [TML] Understanding World Domination. Joseph Paul (02 Feb 2016 18:17 UTC)
Re: [TML] Understanding World Domination. Greg Chalik (02 Feb 2016 19:10 UTC)
Re: [TML] Understanding World Domination. Bruce Johnson (02 Feb 2016 19:38 UTC)
Re: [TML] Understanding World Domination. Knapp (02 Feb 2016 21:25 UTC)
Re: [TML] Understanding World Domination. Joseph Paul (02 Feb 2016 23:47 UTC)
Re: [TML] Understanding World Domination. tmr0195@xxxxxx (03 Feb 2016 01:47 UTC)
Re: [TML] Understanding World Domination. Greg Chalik (03 Feb 2016 04:44 UTC)
Re: [TML] Understanding World Domination. Greg Chalik (03 Feb 2016 04:30 UTC)
Re: [TML] Understanding World Domination. Joseph Paul (03 Feb 2016 14:11 UTC)

Re: [TML] Understanding World Domination. Traveller 01 Feb 2016 18:58 UTC

On 1 Feb 2016, at 17:18, xxxxxx@mail.de wrote:
> In Traveller Terms, however, how is it different from offering favorable conditions for a world to join the 3I?

It must be different or you would have used the European Union admitting the former eastern block countries as example 3.
;-)

Buying your opponents is an excellent strategy in the Civilisation computer game - indeed the Ankh-Morporkian school of conquest ("We can rule you wholesale") is my preferred solution.

In the real world, countries contain people, which can make things more complicated, but there are more than two examples.

Bits of countries changed hands in medieval times by marriage: Eleanor of Aquitaine comes to mind.

The British Empire wasn't entirely military conquest.

One problem seems to be finding the right people to buy the country from - just like bridges, there are plenty of people willing to sell you one!

England's problems after buying Scotland and Britain's after buying Afghanistan should be a warning.

Phil Kitching