looking for equation shadow@xxxxxx (18 Oct 2015 16:14 UTC)
Re: [TML] looking for equation Dave (18 Oct 2015 16:57 UTC)
Re: [TML] looking for equation Bruce Johnson (18 Oct 2015 18:41 UTC)
Re: [TML] looking for equation Bruce Johnson (18 Oct 2015 18:44 UTC)
Re: [TML] looking for equation Rob O'Connor (19 Oct 2015 23:53 UTC)
Re: [TML] looking for equation Rob O'Connor (21 Oct 2015 10:21 UTC)
Re: [TML] looking for equation Rob O'Connor (21 Oct 2015 23:23 UTC)
Re: [TML] looking for equation Bruce Johnson (22 Oct 2015 00:07 UTC)
Re: [TML] looking for equation Rob O'Connor (23 Oct 2015 08:50 UTC)
Re: [TML] looking for equation Bruce Johnson (23 Oct 2015 14:46 UTC)
Re: [TML] looking for equation shadow@xxxxxx (25 Oct 2015 09:26 UTC)
Re: [TML] looking for equation Jerry Barrington (22 Oct 2015 16:18 UTC)
Re: [TML] looking for equation shadow@xxxxxx (23 Oct 2015 12:25 UTC)

Re: [TML] looking for equation Bruce Johnson 22 Oct 2015 00:07 UTC

> On Oct 21, 2015, at 4:23 PM, Rob O'Connor <xxxxxx@ozemail.com.au> wrote:
>
> Hmm.
>
> Have to be careful with how the listserv processes certain character combinations.
>
> > x = a.cos(t)
> > y = b.sin(t)
> >
> > for 0
> > substitute sqrt((D/2)^2 + b^2) for a.
>
> the line 'for 0' started out as
>
> for 0 (less than or equal to) t (less than or equal to) 2.pi
>
> but the symbols got eaten.

Maybe your mail client? Mail provider? The symbols came through my mail client (Mail in OS X 10.10, via an Exchange server)  correctly, but I did wonder what 2 point pi is? 5.1415926535 ? :-P

Some webmail clients can get hinky when dealing with < and > characters.

In fact it will be interesting if you see those two characters I’m talking about ( &lt; and &gt; also interesting to see if they come out that way :-)

--
Bruce Johnson
University of Arizona
College of Pharmacy
Information Technology Group

Institutions do not have opinions, merely customs