looking for equation
shadow@xxxxxx
(18 Oct 2015 16:14 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] looking for equation
Dave
(18 Oct 2015 16:57 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] looking for equation
Bruce Johnson
(18 Oct 2015 18:41 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] looking for equation
Bruce Johnson
(18 Oct 2015 18:44 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] looking for equation
Rob O'Connor
(19 Oct 2015 23:53 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] looking for equation
Rob O'Connor
(21 Oct 2015 10:21 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] looking for equation
Rob O'Connor
(21 Oct 2015 23:23 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] looking for equation Bruce Johnson (22 Oct 2015 00:07 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] looking for equation
Rob O'Connor
(23 Oct 2015 08:50 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] looking for equation
Bruce Johnson
(23 Oct 2015 14:46 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] looking for equation
shadow@xxxxxx
(25 Oct 2015 09:26 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] looking for equation
Jerry Barrington
(22 Oct 2015 16:18 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] looking for equation
shadow@xxxxxx
(23 Oct 2015 12:25 UTC)
|
> On Oct 21, 2015, at 4:23 PM, Rob O'Connor <xxxxxx@ozemail.com.au> wrote: > > Hmm. > > Have to be careful with how the listserv processes certain character combinations. > > > x = a.cos(t) > > y = b.sin(t) > > > > for 0 > > substitute sqrt((D/2)^2 + b^2) for a. > > the line 'for 0' started out as > > for 0 (less than or equal to) t (less than or equal to) 2.pi > > but the symbols got eaten. Maybe your mail client? Mail provider? The symbols came through my mail client (Mail in OS X 10.10, via an Exchange server) correctly, but I did wonder what 2 point pi is? 5.1415926535 ? :-P Some webmail clients can get hinky when dealing with < and > characters. In fact it will be interesting if you see those two characters I’m talking about ( < and > also interesting to see if they come out that way :-) -- Bruce Johnson University of Arizona College of Pharmacy Information Technology Group Institutions do not have opinions, merely customs