Re: Understanding batteries and solar and motors. robocon@xxxxxx (06 Oct 2015 23:38 UTC)
Re: [TML] Re: Understanding batteries and solar and motors. Jeffrey Schwartz (07 Oct 2015 13:17 UTC)
RE: [TML] Re: Understanding batteries and solar and motors. Michael Fischer (08 Oct 2015 06:11 UTC)
Re: [TML] Understanding batteries and solar and motors. Bruce Johnson (07 Oct 2015 16:09 UTC)
Re: [TML] Re: Understanding batteries and solar and motors. shadow@xxxxxx (08 Oct 2015 06:16 UTC)
AW: [TML] Re: Understanding batteries and solar and motors. Michael.Fischer.Bonn@t-online.de (08 Oct 2015 12:55 UTC)
Re: [TML] Re: Understanding batteries and solar and motors. Phil Pugliese (07 Oct 2015 16:13 UTC)
Re: [TML] Understanding batteries and solar and motors. Bruce Johnson (07 Oct 2015 17:30 UTC)
RE: [TML] Re: Understanding batteries and solar and motors. Anthony Jackson (08 Oct 2015 18:56 UTC)
Re: [TML] Understanding batteries and solar and motors. Bruce Johnson (08 Oct 2015 20:30 UTC)
RE: [TML] Understanding batteries and solar and motors. Anthony Jackson (08 Oct 2015 21:57 UTC)
Re: [TML] Understanding batteries and solar and motors. Craig Berry (08 Oct 2015 22:02 UTC)
RE: [TML] Understanding batteries and solar and motors. Phil Pugliese (09 Oct 2015 13:38 UTC)
Re: [TML] Understanding batteries and solar and motors. shadow@xxxxxx (09 Oct 2015 07:03 UTC)
Re: [TML] Understanding batteries and solar and motors. Phil Pugliese (09 Oct 2015 15:34 UTC)
Re: [TML] Understanding batteries and solar and motors. Jeffrey Schwartz (09 Oct 2015 15:44 UTC)
RE: [TML] Understanding batteries and solar and motors. Anthony Jackson (09 Oct 2015 16:43 UTC)
Re: [TML] Understanding batteries and solar and motors. Bruce Johnson (09 Oct 2015 20:49 UTC)
Re: [TML] Understanding batteries and solar and motors. Phil Pugliese (09 Oct 2015 22:32 UTC)
Re: [TML] Understanding batteries and solar and motors. shadow@xxxxxx (11 Oct 2015 03:40 UTC)
Re: [TML] Understanding batteries and solar and motors. Kenneth Barns (16 Oct 2015 22:19 UTC)

Re: [TML] Re: Understanding batteries and solar and motors. Jeffrey Schwartz 07 Oct 2015 13:17 UTC

Although consider that you don't drive a car continuously.

I'm in Florida, we average 4 "peak output" hours of sunlight a day.
Lets say I have 3 square meters on top of my car, and go with the 390w/sqm
That's around 4.7kwh solar input per day...  or about 6 HP/hours per day.

I ran the Torque app on my car, and cruising on the interstate I only
draw about 2-3 HP to cover wind resistance.
I very briefly pull more as I accel to 70.
Start/Stop rush hour traffic, I pull 30hp or so for a few seconds, then coast.
Around town, it's a similar thing.

I suspect that the average driver could get along on this.

On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 8:40 AM, Knapp <xxxxxx@gmail.com> wrote:
> So we are looking at 650 watts per square meter * .6 which is 390 watts as
> the current max and future max might be something like 600 watts per square
> meter which still leaves a car or boat very underpowered.
>
> "The car motors are rated to a peak power of x watts. They don't need to run
> at peak output otherwise you couldn't get the rated range figures."
>
> Is this because of air and road friction or does the motor loose efficiency
> at peak output.
>
> --
> Douglas E Knapp, MSAOM, LAc.
>
> -----
> The Traveller Mailing List
> Archives at http://archives.simplelists.com/tml
> Report problems to xxxxxx@travellercentral.com
> To unsubscribe from this list please goto
> http://www.simplelists.com/confirm.php?u=vSy3NFQJMSbZKrzPfC3XucFBsUCMtKrI