Watching A Planet Kurt Feltenberger (25 Sep 2015 04:01 UTC)
Re: [TML] Watching A Planet Thomas Jones-Low (25 Sep 2015 04:43 UTC)
Re: [TML] Watching A Planet Greg Nokes (25 Sep 2015 04:54 UTC)
Re: [TML] Watching A Planet Kurt Feltenberger (25 Sep 2015 23:42 UTC)
Re: [TML] Watching A Planet Kurt Feltenberger (25 Sep 2015 23:41 UTC)
Re: [TML] Watching A Planet Edward Swatschek (26 Sep 2015 00:45 UTC)
Re: [TML] Watching A Planet shadow@xxxxxx (29 Sep 2015 18:55 UTC)
Re: Watching A Planet Rob O'Connor (26 Sep 2015 08:54 UTC)
Re: [TML] Re: Watching A Planet Craig Berry (28 Sep 2015 03:28 UTC)
Re: [TML] Watching A Planet Bruce Johnson (28 Sep 2015 04:09 UTC)
Re: [TML] Watching A Planet Kurt Feltenberger (29 Sep 2015 00:22 UTC)
Re: [TML] Watching A Planet Rob O'Connor (29 Sep 2015 06:15 UTC)
Re: [TML] Watching A Planet Grimmund (29 Sep 2015 13:40 UTC)
Re: [TML] Watching A Planet shadow@xxxxxx (29 Sep 2015 18:55 UTC)
Re: [TML] Re: Watching A Planet Grimmund (28 Sep 2015 13:02 UTC)
Re: [TML] Re: Watching A Planet Kurt Feltenberger (29 Sep 2015 00:26 UTC)
Re: [TML] Re: Watching A Planet Craig Berry (29 Sep 2015 03:56 UTC)
Re: [TML] Re: Watching A Planet Greg Chalik (29 Sep 2015 04:08 UTC)
Re: [TML] Re: Watching A Planet Jeffrey Schwartz (29 Sep 2015 14:43 UTC)
Re: [TML] Watching A Planet Bruce Johnson (29 Sep 2015 14:53 UTC)
Re: [TML] Watching A Planet Craig Berry (29 Sep 2015 15:19 UTC)
Re: [TML] Re: Watching A Planet Kurt Feltenberger (29 Sep 2015 00:18 UTC)
Re: [TML] Watching A Planet Bruce Johnson (29 Sep 2015 16:04 UTC)
Re: [TML] Watching A Planet Jeffrey Schwartz (29 Sep 2015 16:10 UTC)
Re: [TML] Watching A Planet Kelly St. Clair (29 Sep 2015 16:53 UTC)
Re: [TML] Watching A Planet Greg Nokes (29 Sep 2015 18:55 UTC)
Re: [TML] Re: Watching A Planet Rob O'Connor (30 Sep 2015 09:37 UTC)

Re: [TML] Watching A Planet shadow@xxxxxx 29 Sep 2015 18:55 UTC

On 25 Sep 2015 at 19:40, Kurt Feltenberger wrote:

> On 9/25/2015 12:43 AM, Thomas Jones-Low wrote:
> > If you have a planet with a moon I would select the L4 or L5 points.
> > The leading or trailing position avoids the EM issues. If your stealth
> > fails partly your ship may be mistaken for another rock in the stable
> > point. For worlds without a moon the planetary L4/5 point may work for
> > the same reason but may be further away than you like.
>
> I thought the Trojan points were quite a bit further away than 1.5m km?
> That was my original thought, to have them there, as there may be some
> captured rocks that could be used as masking, but then I seemed to
> recall they were quite a bit further out.

L1, L2 & L3 are "metastable". That is, anything placed at them will
only stay there as long as nothing disturbs them. If they move at all
off the point, they'll drift farther away.

L4 & L5 are "stable" anything that drifts off the point will tend to
drift back as long as it doesn't drift too far.

So L1, L2 & L3 are like hilltops. You can place something there but
if it gets nudged much it'll roll away.

L4 & L5 are more like depressions. Thing will tend to roll back to
them unless pushed far enough to go over the "rim".

So you won't find rocks and dust at L1, L2 & L3. You will at L5.

--
Leonard Erickson (aka shadow)
shadow at shadowgard dot com