Watching A Planet
Kurt Feltenberger
(25 Sep 2015 04:01 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Watching A Planet
Thomas Jones-Low
(25 Sep 2015 04:43 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Watching A Planet
Greg Nokes
(25 Sep 2015 04:54 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Watching A Planet
Kurt Feltenberger
(25 Sep 2015 23:42 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Watching A Planet
Kurt Feltenberger
(25 Sep 2015 23:41 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Watching A Planet
Edward Swatschek
(26 Sep 2015 00:45 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Watching A Planet
shadow@xxxxxx
(29 Sep 2015 18:55 UTC)
|
Re: Watching A Planet
Rob O'Connor
(26 Sep 2015 08:54 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Re: Watching A Planet
Grimmund
(28 Sep 2015 13:02 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Re: Watching A Planet
Kurt Feltenberger
(29 Sep 2015 00:26 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Re: Watching A Planet
Craig Berry
(29 Sep 2015 03:56 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Re: Watching A Planet
Greg Chalik
(29 Sep 2015 04:08 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Re: Watching A Planet
Jeffrey Schwartz
(29 Sep 2015 14:43 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Watching A Planet
Bruce Johnson
(29 Sep 2015 14:53 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Watching A Planet
Craig Berry
(29 Sep 2015 15:19 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Re: Watching A Planet
Kurt Feltenberger
(29 Sep 2015 00:18 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Watching A Planet
Bruce Johnson
(29 Sep 2015 16:04 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Watching A Planet
Jeffrey Schwartz
(29 Sep 2015 16:10 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Watching A Planet
Kelly St. Clair
(29 Sep 2015 16:53 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Watching A Planet
Greg Nokes
(29 Sep 2015 18:55 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Re: Watching A Planet
Rob O'Connor
(30 Sep 2015 09:37 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Re: Watching A Planet
Craig Berry
(28 Sep 2015 03:28 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Watching A Planet
Bruce Johnson
(28 Sep 2015 04:09 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Watching A Planet Kurt Feltenberger (29 Sep 2015 00:22 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Watching A Planet
Rob O'Connor
(29 Sep 2015 06:15 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Watching A Planet
Grimmund
(29 Sep 2015 13:40 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Watching A Planet
shadow@xxxxxx
(29 Sep 2015 18:55 UTC)
|
On 9/28/2015 12:09 AM, Bruce Johnson wrote: >> On Sep 27, 2015, at 8:28 PM, Craig Berry<xxxxxx@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> >Sorry for being late to the party, but this exact scenario is portrayed in depth in Vinge's_A Deepness in the Sky_. The observers set up camp at the sunward Lagrange point, but also have smaller satellites closer in for global continuous coverage. > Hack an existing satellite(s) with the coverage you want, tight beam to your relay or ship. > > This will require humint resources (aka PC’s:-) to arrange a problem with the target satellites and get the contract for the fix. > > Fixing leo or even synchronous satellites will be much more akin to ‘Wichita Lineman’ than ‘Ground Control to Major Tom’…attaching a tap to the satellites might be the easiest way to avoid detection. There are no artificial satellites around the planet which is, for all intents and purposes, uninhabited except for what the ship is observing. > > Also subject of interest: what does orbital space around a civilized planet with a few thousand years of routine spaceflight look like? I would think it depends on how the world developed. If it developed like Earth, I would suspect that after the first impact that caused a major loss of life that there would be a push to "vacuum" the debris and clean the junk out of the orbits (the stuff that hasn't already burned up). However, if it was a world where that was settled by a relatively high tech society (TL9/10+), then I would think that things would be relatively clean as you wouldn't be discarding boosters and parts of the launch vehicle used to put an object into orbit. -- Kurt Feltenberger xxxxxx@thepaw.org/xxxxxx@yahoo.com “Before today, I was scared to live, after today, I'm scared I'm not living enough." - Me