Virtuality and its Social Consequences (long) Jim Vassilakos (14 Sep 2015 23:32 UTC)
Re: [TML] Virtuality and its Social Consequences (long) Kurt Feltenberger (15 Sep 2015 04:01 UTC)
Re: [TML] Virtuality and its Social Consequences (long) William Ewing (15 Sep 2015 04:26 UTC)
Re: [TML] Virtuality and its Social Consequences (long) Kenneth Barns (15 Sep 2015 05:05 UTC)
Re: [TML] Virtuality and its Social Consequences (long) Kenneth Barns (16 Sep 2015 07:24 UTC)
Re: [TML] Virtuality and its Social Consequences (long) Richard Aiken (15 Sep 2015 23:25 UTC)
Re: [TML] Virtuality and its Social Consequences (long) Phil Pugliese (16 Sep 2015 08:09 UTC)
Re: [TML] Virtuality and its Social Consequences (long) Jeffrey Schwartz (15 Sep 2015 15:19 UTC)
Re: [TML] Virtuality and its Social Consequences (long) Bruce Johnson (15 Sep 2015 15:53 UTC)
Re: [TML] Virtuality and its Social Consequences (long) Bruce Johnson (15 Sep 2015 18:11 UTC)
Re: [TML] Virtuality and its Social Consequences (long) Jeffrey Schwartz (15 Sep 2015 19:12 UTC)
Re: Virtuality and its SocialConsequences (long) Rob O'Connor (16 Sep 2015 08:35 UTC)
Re: [TML] Re: Virtuality and its SocialConsequences (long) Kenneth Barns (16 Sep 2015 09:58 UTC)
Re: [TML] Re: Virtuality and its SocialConsequences(long) Rob O'Connor (17 Sep 2015 07:42 UTC)
Re: [TML] Re: Virtuality and its SocialConsequences(long) Kenneth Barns (17 Sep 2015 09:23 UTC)
Re: [TML] Re: Virtuality and its SocialConsequences(long) Rob O'Connor (18 Sep 2015 10:08 UTC)
Re: [TML] Virtuality and its SocialConsequences(long) Andrew Long (18 Sep 2015 16:06 UTC)
Re: [TML] Virtuality and its SocialConsequences(long) Bruce Johnson (17 Sep 2015 16:00 UTC)
Re: [TML] Re: Virtuality and its SocialConsequences (long) shadow@xxxxxx (17 Sep 2015 23:06 UTC)
Re: [TML] Re: Virtuality and its SocialConsequences (long) Jim Vassilakos (17 Sep 2015 23:26 UTC)
Re: [TML] Re: Virtuality and its SocialConsequences (long) Jim Vassilakos (18 Sep 2015 04:31 UTC)
Re: [TML] Re: Virtuality and its SocialConsequences (long) Richard Aiken (18 Sep 2015 05:28 UTC)
Re: [TML] Re: Virtuality and its SocialConsequences (long) Kenneth Barns (18 Sep 2015 06:11 UTC)
Re: [TML] Re: Virtuality and its SocialConsequences (long) Phil Pugliese (18 Sep 2015 07:46 UTC)
Re: [TML] Virtuality and its SocialConsequences (long) Bruce Johnson (18 Sep 2015 15:57 UTC)
Re: [TML] Virtuality and its SocialConsequences (long) Phil Pugliese (18 Sep 2015 23:31 UTC)
Re: [TML] Virtuality and its SocialConsequences (long) Craig Berry (18 Sep 2015 23:41 UTC)
Re: [TML] Virtuality and its SocialConsequences (long) Jim Vassilakos (19 Sep 2015 00:18 UTC)
Re: [TML] Virtuality and its SocialConsequences (long) Bruce Johnson (19 Sep 2015 00:45 UTC)
Re: [TML] Virtuality and its SocialConsequences (long) Craig Berry (19 Sep 2015 01:39 UTC)
Re: [TML] Virtuality and its SocialConsequences (long) Richard Aiken (19 Sep 2015 06:23 UTC)
Re: [TML] Virtuality and its SocialConsequences (long) Bruce Johnson (19 Sep 2015 18:14 UTC)
Re: [TML] Virtuality and its SocialConsequences (long) Jim Vassilakos (19 Sep 2015 22:22 UTC)
Re: [TML] Re: Virtuality and its SocialConsequences(long) Rob O'Connor (19 Sep 2015 23:55 UTC)
Re: [TML] Virtuality and its Social Consequences (long) Bruce Johnson (17 Sep 2015 22:57 UTC)

Re: [TML] Virtuality and its SocialConsequences (long) Phil Pugliese 18 Sep 2015 23:31 UTC

--------------------------------------------
On Fri, 9/18/15, Bruce Johnson <xxxxxx@Pharmacy.Arizona.EDU> wrote:

 Subject: Re: [TML] Virtuality and its SocialConsequences (long)
 To: "xxxxxx@simplelists.com" <xxxxxx@simplelists.com>
 Date: Friday, September 18, 2015, 8:57 AM

 > On
 Sep 18, 2015, at 12:46 AM, Phil Pugliese (via tml list)
 <xxxxxx@simplelists.com>
 wrote:
 >
 > This email
 was sent from yahoo.com which does not allow forwarding of
 emails via email lists. Therefore the sender's email
 address (xxxxxx@yahoo.com)
 has been replaced with a dummy one. The original message
 follows:
 >
 > Reminds
 me of the 'Humanoids' from '50's
 sci-fi....

 Or Cylons...

 --
 Bruce
 Johnson
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I think they illustrate very well the two different directions AI servitors could go.
Jack Williamson's Humanoids (btw he published a sequel in the latter 1/2 of the '70's) took their 'serve mankind' prime directive so seriously that they set up what was a real 'nanny state' where humans catered to as some pampered very young children are now.
But definitely NOT allowed any say at all in the process while the Cylons went in the other direction. In both cases, though, once the AI's 'broke loose' mankind, with few exceptions, became essentially a spectator.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------