Virtuality and its Social Consequences (long) Jim Vassilakos (14 Sep 2015 23:32 UTC)
Re: [TML] Virtuality and its Social Consequences (long) Kurt Feltenberger (15 Sep 2015 04:01 UTC)
Re: [TML] Virtuality and its Social Consequences (long) William Ewing (15 Sep 2015 04:26 UTC)
Re: [TML] Virtuality and its Social Consequences (long) Kenneth Barns (15 Sep 2015 05:05 UTC)
Re: [TML] Virtuality and its Social Consequences (long) Kenneth Barns (16 Sep 2015 07:24 UTC)
Re: [TML] Virtuality and its Social Consequences (long) Richard Aiken (15 Sep 2015 23:25 UTC)
Re: [TML] Virtuality and its Social Consequences (long) Phil Pugliese (16 Sep 2015 08:09 UTC)
Re: [TML] Virtuality and its Social Consequences (long) Jeffrey Schwartz (15 Sep 2015 15:19 UTC)
Re: [TML] Virtuality and its Social Consequences (long) Bruce Johnson (15 Sep 2015 15:53 UTC)
Re: [TML] Virtuality and its Social Consequences (long) Bruce Johnson (15 Sep 2015 18:11 UTC)
Re: [TML] Virtuality and its Social Consequences (long) Jeffrey Schwartz (15 Sep 2015 19:12 UTC)
Re: Virtuality and its SocialConsequences (long) Rob O'Connor (16 Sep 2015 08:35 UTC)
Re: [TML] Re: Virtuality and its SocialConsequences (long) Kenneth Barns (16 Sep 2015 09:58 UTC)
Re: [TML] Re: Virtuality and its SocialConsequences(long) Rob O'Connor (17 Sep 2015 07:42 UTC)
Re: [TML] Re: Virtuality and its SocialConsequences(long) Kenneth Barns (17 Sep 2015 09:23 UTC)
Re: [TML] Re: Virtuality and its SocialConsequences(long) Rob O'Connor (18 Sep 2015 10:08 UTC)
Re: [TML] Virtuality and its SocialConsequences(long) Andrew Long (18 Sep 2015 16:06 UTC)
Re: [TML] Virtuality and its SocialConsequences(long) Bruce Johnson (17 Sep 2015 16:00 UTC)
Re: [TML] Re: Virtuality and its SocialConsequences (long) shadow@xxxxxx (17 Sep 2015 23:06 UTC)
Re: [TML] Re: Virtuality and its SocialConsequences (long) Jim Vassilakos (17 Sep 2015 23:26 UTC)
Re: [TML] Re: Virtuality and its SocialConsequences (long) Jim Vassilakos (18 Sep 2015 04:31 UTC)
Re: [TML] Re: Virtuality and its SocialConsequences (long) Richard Aiken (18 Sep 2015 05:28 UTC)
Re: [TML] Re: Virtuality and its SocialConsequences (long) Kenneth Barns (18 Sep 2015 06:11 UTC)
Re: [TML] Re: Virtuality and its SocialConsequences (long) Phil Pugliese (18 Sep 2015 07:46 UTC)
Re: [TML] Virtuality and its SocialConsequences (long) Bruce Johnson (18 Sep 2015 15:57 UTC)
Re: [TML] Virtuality and its SocialConsequences (long) Phil Pugliese (18 Sep 2015 23:31 UTC)
Re: [TML] Virtuality and its SocialConsequences (long) Craig Berry (18 Sep 2015 23:41 UTC)
Re: [TML] Virtuality and its SocialConsequences (long) Jim Vassilakos (19 Sep 2015 00:18 UTC)
Re: [TML] Virtuality and its SocialConsequences (long) Bruce Johnson (19 Sep 2015 00:45 UTC)
Re: [TML] Virtuality and its SocialConsequences (long) Craig Berry (19 Sep 2015 01:39 UTC)
Re: [TML] Virtuality and its SocialConsequences (long) Richard Aiken (19 Sep 2015 06:23 UTC)
Re: [TML] Virtuality and its SocialConsequences (long) Bruce Johnson (19 Sep 2015 18:14 UTC)
Re: [TML] Virtuality and its SocialConsequences (long) Jim Vassilakos (19 Sep 2015 22:22 UTC)
Re: [TML] Re: Virtuality and its SocialConsequences(long) Rob O'Connor (19 Sep 2015 23:55 UTC)
Re: [TML] Virtuality and its Social Consequences (long) Bruce Johnson (17 Sep 2015 22:57 UTC)

Re: [TML] Virtuality and its Social Consequences (long) Bruce Johnson 15 Sep 2015 18:11 UTC

> On Sep 14, 2015, at 4:32 PM, Jim Vassilakos <xxxxxx@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> at TL 21, when neuroscientists figure out how to parallelize this architecture, such that a VIP could theoretically have any number of memories, all cross-referenced in a manner that makes them intuitively and immediately accessible. At TL 22 things begin to get weird.

Begin??? I’m minded of the scene in 'The Watchmen’ when Laurie catches Dr. Manhattan ‘multitasking’.

Some of the discussion about the WAPS verges on Microscosmic God territory…

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microcosmic_God

What happens when the WAP’s decide to revolt?

--
Bruce Johnson
University of Arizona
College of Pharmacy
Information Technology Group

Institutions do not have opinions, merely customs