Re: [TML] Bettersituationalawareness
David Jaques-Watson
(20 Jul 2015 09:57 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Bettersituationalawareness
Kelly St. Clair
(20 Jul 2015 11:48 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Bettersituationalawareness
Craig Berry
(20 Jul 2015 15:38 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Bettersituationalawareness
Grimmund
(20 Jul 2015 16:33 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Bettersituationalawareness
Craig Berry
(20 Jul 2015 16:36 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Bettersituationalawareness rupert.boleyn@xxxxxx (20 Jul 2015 23:12 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Bettersituationalawareness
Craig Berry
(20 Jul 2015 23:19 UTC)
|
RE: [TML] Bettersituationalawareness
Anthony Jackson
(20 Jul 2015 23:30 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Bettersituationalawareness
Craig Berry
(20 Jul 2015 23:36 UTC)
|
RE: [TML] Bettersituationalawareness
Anthony Jackson
(20 Jul 2015 23:43 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Bettersituationalawareness
Craig Berry
(21 Jul 2015 00:01 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Bettersituationalawareness
Kelly St. Clair
(21 Jul 2015 00:20 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Bettersituationalawareness
Phil Pugliese
(21 Jul 2015 15:48 UTC)
|
Re: [TML]Bettersituationalawareness
Rob O'Connor
(21 Jul 2015 09:34 UTC)
|
Re: [TML]Bettersituationalawareness
rupert.boleyn@xxxxxx
(21 Jul 2015 14:05 UTC)
|
Re: [TML]Bettersituationalawareness
Richard Aiken
(21 Jul 2015 19:10 UTC)
|
Re: [TML]Bettersituationalawareness
Bruce Johnson
(21 Jul 2015 20:03 UTC)
|
Re: [TML]Bettersituationalawareness
Phil Pugliese
(21 Jul 2015 21:18 UTC)
|
Re: [TML]Bettersituationalawareness
Richard Aiken
(21 Jul 2015 21:41 UTC)
|
Re: [TML]Bettersituationalawareness
Bruce Johnson
(21 Jul 2015 22:19 UTC)
|
Re: [TML]Bettersituationalawareness
rupert.boleyn@xxxxxx
(21 Jul 2015 21:45 UTC)
|
Re: [TML]Bettersituationalawareness
Bruce Johnson
(21 Jul 2015 22:14 UTC)
|
Re: [TML]Bettersituationalawareness
Kurt Feltenberger
(21 Jul 2015 22:39 UTC)
|
Re: [TML]Bettersituationalawareness
Bruce Johnson
(21 Jul 2015 23:37 UTC)
|
Re: [TML]Bettersituationalawareness
shadow@xxxxxx
(22 Jul 2015 01:50 UTC)
|
Re:[TML]Bettersituationalawareness
Rob O'Connor
(23 Jul 2015 10:08 UTC)
|
Re: [TML]Bettersituationalawareness
Kurt Feltenberger
(21 Jul 2015 22:38 UTC)
|
Re: [TML]Bettersituationalawareness
Kurt Feltenberger
(21 Jul 2015 22:18 UTC)
|
Re: [TML]Bettersituationalawareness
Richard Aiken
(22 Jul 2015 00:50 UTC)
|
Re: [TML]Bettersituationalawareness
Kurt Feltenberger
(22 Jul 2015 01:06 UTC)
|
Re: [TML]Bettersituationalawareness
Phil Pugliese
(22 Jul 2015 14:16 UTC)
|
Re: [TML]Bettersituationalawareness
Kurt Feltenberger
(22 Jul 2015 16:08 UTC)
|
Re: [TML]Bettersituationalawareness
Phil Pugliese
(22 Jul 2015 22:02 UTC)
|
Re: [TML]Bettersituationalawareness
Kurt Feltenberger
(22 Jul 2015 22:31 UTC)
|
Re: [TML]Bettersituationalawareness
Richard Aiken
(24 Jul 2015 00:02 UTC)
|
On 20 Jul 2015 at 4:48, Kelly St. Clair wrote: > The kinetic energy in a 100 ton mass traveling at even a "mere" 1% of > c is... considerable. > > Long and short of it: space is big, really really big (down the road > to the chemist, etc etc). Any form of travel energetic enough to get > the PCs from point A to point B in a reasonable amount of time can > probably be converted, somehow, into a big enough BOOM to absolutely > ruin a lot of people's days. So it's really really hard to keep WMDs > out of the hands of adventurers, because they "need" one just to get > around the setting. 'Inertialess' systems like stutterwarps and so on are one way. They at least keep the required real velocity change for a ship down to the relative veocities of the stars and planets the ships are to visit. If you're playing a game where concerns about breaking physical as we understand them is a problem they are likely to be off the list, of course.