Better situational awareness
robocon@xxxxxx
(17 Jul 2015 01:22 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Better situational awareness
Joseph Paul
(17 Jul 2015 03:08 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Better situationalawareness
Robert
(18 Jul 2015 00:22 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Better situationalawareness
rupert.boleyn@xxxxxx
(18 Jul 2015 04:06 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Better situationalawareness
Craig Berry
(18 Jul 2015 04:59 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Better situationalawareness
rupert.boleyn@xxxxxx
(18 Jul 2015 06:02 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Better situationalawareness
Rob O'Connor
(19 Jul 2015 00:41 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Better situationalawareness
Craig Berry
(19 Jul 2015 03:58 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Better situational awareness
rupert.boleyn@xxxxxx
(19 Jul 2015 09:00 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Better situationalawareness
Rob O'Connor
(20 Jul 2015 09:00 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Better situational awareness
rupert.boleyn@xxxxxx
(19 Jul 2015 09:02 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Better situational awareness
Grimmund
(17 Jul 2015 12:49 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Better situational awareness
Richard Aiken
(17 Jul 2015 18:41 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Better situational awareness
Greg Nokes
(17 Jul 2015 18:55 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Better situational awareness
Craig Berry
(17 Jul 2015 19:00 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Better situational awareness
Grimmund
(17 Jul 2015 19:47 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Better situational awareness
Bruce Johnson
(17 Jul 2015 21:05 UTC)
|
RE: [TML] Better situational awareness
Anthony Jackson
(17 Jul 2015 21:44 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Better situational awareness
Jim Vassilakos
(17 Jul 2015 22:54 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Better situational awareness
Grimmund
(17 Jul 2015 23:14 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Better situational awareness
Craig Berry
(17 Jul 2015 23:31 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Better situational awareness
Richard Aiken
(18 Jul 2015 06:21 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Better situational awareness Phil Pugliese (18 Jul 2015 15:32 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Better situational awareness
Greg Chalik
(22 Jul 2015 06:43 UTC)
|
-------------------------------------------- On Fri, 7/17/15, Richard Aiken <raikenclw@gmail.com> wrote: Subject: Re: [TML] Better situational awareness To: "tml" <tml@simplelists.com> Date: Friday, July 17, 2015, 11:20 PM On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 5:44 PM, Anthony Jackson <ajackson@iii.com> wrote: If you do it right, you may even get a donut-shaped cloud of gas, but even if you don't, blowing something up at the 100d limit will turn it into a cloud three times the size of the planet by the time it hits. Maybe an attacker counts on that. Or possibly even rigs his near-c rock to explode so as to create a VERY precise doughnut. He might do so in order to sweep the 100D volume clear of all defence installations/ships (and incidentally everything and everyone else . . . an "Orbital Napoleon Omelette," don't ya know . . . ). This would leave only those defences on/in the target world itself plus any placed outside easy initial engagement range to oppose his invasion fleet. NOTE: I had a thought on meson guns, BTW. It might be that they're called "meson guns" because an odd quirk of jump physics makes it possible to project that *particular* subatomic particle through local jump space to re-emerge nearly-instantenously at precise coordinates in [relatively] nearby real space. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ah yes, the breakthru discovery in physics by the famed terran physicist 'whats-is-name'. Which greatly facilitated the conquest of the 1st Imp by the upstart terrans, as every student learns in elementary school. ;-P ==============================================================================