Better situational awareness
robocon@xxxxxx
(17 Jul 2015 01:22 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Better situational awareness
Joseph Paul
(17 Jul 2015 03:08 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Better situationalawareness
Robert
(18 Jul 2015 00:22 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Better situationalawareness
rupert.boleyn@xxxxxx
(18 Jul 2015 04:06 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Better situationalawareness
Craig Berry
(18 Jul 2015 04:59 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Better situationalawareness
rupert.boleyn@xxxxxx
(18 Jul 2015 06:02 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Better situationalawareness
Rob O'Connor
(19 Jul 2015 00:41 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Better situationalawareness
Craig Berry
(19 Jul 2015 03:58 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Better situational awareness
rupert.boleyn@xxxxxx
(19 Jul 2015 09:00 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Better situationalawareness
Rob O'Connor
(20 Jul 2015 09:00 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Better situational awareness
rupert.boleyn@xxxxxx
(19 Jul 2015 09:02 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Better situational awareness
Grimmund
(17 Jul 2015 12:49 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Better situational awareness
Richard Aiken
(17 Jul 2015 18:41 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Better situational awareness
Greg Nokes
(17 Jul 2015 18:55 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Better situational awareness
Craig Berry
(17 Jul 2015 19:00 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Better situational awareness
Grimmund
(17 Jul 2015 19:47 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Better situational awareness Bruce Johnson (17 Jul 2015 21:05 UTC)
|
RE: [TML] Better situational awareness
Anthony Jackson
(17 Jul 2015 21:44 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Better situational awareness
Jim Vassilakos
(17 Jul 2015 22:54 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Better situational awareness
Grimmund
(17 Jul 2015 23:14 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Better situational awareness
Craig Berry
(17 Jul 2015 23:31 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Better situational awareness
Richard Aiken
(18 Jul 2015 06:21 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Better situational awareness
Phil Pugliese
(18 Jul 2015 15:32 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Better situational awareness
Greg Chalik
(22 Jul 2015 06:43 UTC)
|
> On Jul 17, 2015, at 12:47 PM, Grimmund <xxxxxx@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Richard Aiken <xxxxxx@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> On the fourth tentacle . . . near-c rocks are beginning to look attractive . >> . . > > PD meson guns. Pump enough energy into the rock, and it breaks up > into gravel. :) Near-C gravel, which does pretty much the same amount of damage to your target as the original solid does. This is kind of like having a magic anti-bullet that turns an incoming 7.56 round to buckshot :-/ We had a long discussion of this sort of thing back when we were graced with not one, but two movies in a short time about saving the earth from an oncoming asteroid or comet. Busting it up isn’t sufficient to save us; because whether it’s one large mass or a billion smaller ones, they dump the same amount of energy into the planet when they hit. A near-c rock is going to have a gargantuan amount of inertial mass that will be well-nigh impossible to deflect. Even turning the damned thing into high-speed plasma won’t help you much….you just get a planet-sized plasma cannon hit. -- Bruce Johnson University of Arizona College of Pharmacy Information Technology Group Institutions do not have opinions, merely customs