sensors and ops (was berthing) Grimmund (24 Jun 2015 21:30 UTC)
Re: [TML] sensors and ops (was berthing) Greg Chalik (24 Jun 2015 22:13 UTC)
Re: [TML] sensors and ops (was berthing) Grimmund (24 Jun 2015 22:44 UTC)
Re: [TML] sensors and ops (was berthing) Tim (25 Jun 2015 04:50 UTC)
Re: [TML] sensors and ops (was berthing) William Ewing (25 Jun 2015 05:38 UTC)
Re: [TML] sensors and ops (was berthing) shadow@xxxxxx (25 Jun 2015 06:58 UTC)
Re: [TML] sensors and ops (was berthing) William Ewing (25 Jun 2015 07:20 UTC)
Re: [TML] sensors and ops (was berthing) Tim (25 Jun 2015 07:01 UTC)
Re: [TML] sensors and ops (was berthing) William Ewing (25 Jun 2015 07:23 UTC)
Re: [TML] sensors and ops (was berthing) Ethan McKinney (28 Jun 2015 02:29 UTC)
Re: [TML] sensors and ops (was berthing) William Ewing (30 Jun 2015 01:31 UTC)
Re: [TML] sensors and ops (was berthing) Grimmund (30 Jun 2015 12:58 UTC)
Re: [TML] sensors and ops (was berthing) Evyn MacDude (30 Jun 2015 18:10 UTC)
Re: [TML] sensors and ops (was berthing) Grimmund (30 Jun 2015 18:21 UTC)
Re: [TML] sensors and ops (was berthing) Evyn MacDude (30 Jun 2015 18:45 UTC)
Re: [TML] sensors and ops (was berthing) Craig Berry (30 Jun 2015 19:50 UTC)
Re: [TML] sensors and ops (was berthing) William Ewing (01 Jul 2015 05:46 UTC)
Re: [TML] sensors and ops (was berthing) Knapp (30 Jun 2015 19:59 UTC)
Re: [TML] sensors and ops (was berthing) Richard Aiken (01 Jul 2015 05:07 UTC)
Re: [TML] sensors and ops (was berthing) Grimmund (01 Jul 2015 12:47 UTC)
Re: [TML] sensors and ops (was berthing) Tim (01 Jul 2015 22:51 UTC)
Re: [TML] sensors and ops (was berthing) Grimmund (25 Jun 2015 12:54 UTC)
Re: [TML] sensors and ops (was berthing) shadow@xxxxxx (25 Jun 2015 06:58 UTC)

Re: [TML] sensors and ops (was berthing) Grimmund 30 Jun 2015 18:21 UTC

On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 1:09 PM, Evyn MacDude <evyn.macdude@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 8:31 PM, William Ewing (via tml list)
>> <nobody@simplelists.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> RADAR: Bam! bearing and range, in digital format for entry into fire
>>> control computer.

>> Sure.  Except with radar, you have to wait for the signal to round trip.
>> And your radar transmission gives your position away.

> How so? Your returns travel at the same speed a passive return would.

If you are TRANSMITTING you're actively advertising your position to
anyone listening for radar band signals.

(OK, if you're warmer than interstellar space, you're radiating IR and
thus advertising your position, too.  But radar, as an active sensor,
adds another megawatt+ of "HEY, I'M OVER HERE".

>> LIDAR:  Range and bearing, digital.

> Same problems as radar....

yep.  And I suspect, not as useful for searches.

>>> Telescope: nice picture
>
>
> How big is that processor converting said picture?

 About two inches square.  :)

--

"Any sufficiently advanced parody is indistinguishable from a genuine
kook." -Alan Morgan