Re: [TML]Question
David Jaques-Watson
(19 Jun 2015 23:12 UTC)
|
Re: [TML]Question
Greg Chalik
(20 Jun 2015 11:19 UTC)
|
Re: [TML]Question
Richard Aiken
(20 Jun 2015 14:19 UTC)
|
Re: [TML]Question
Greg Chalik
(20 Jun 2015 23:59 UTC)
|
Re: [TML]Question
Richard Aiken
(21 Jun 2015 03:42 UTC)
|
Re: [TML]Question
Greg Chalik
(21 Jun 2015 06:29 UTC)
|
Re: [TML]Question
Richard Aiken
(21 Jun 2015 06:58 UTC)
|
Re: [TML]Question
Richard Aiken
(21 Jun 2015 07:01 UTC)
|
Re: [TML]Question
Greg Chalik
(21 Jun 2015 11:08 UTC)
|
Re: [TML]Question
Kelly St. Clair
(20 Jun 2015 15:54 UTC)
|
Re: [TML]Question
Greg Chalik
(21 Jun 2015 00:20 UTC)
|
Re: [TML]Question
Kurt Feltenberger
(20 Jun 2015 18:23 UTC)
|
Re: [TML]Question
Richard Aiken
(20 Jun 2015 18:26 UTC)
|
Re: [TML]Question
rupert.boleyn@xxxxxx
(20 Jun 2015 23:08 UTC)
|
Re: [TML]Question
Greg Chalik
(21 Jun 2015 00:22 UTC)
|
Re: [TML]Question
Freelance Traveller
(20 Jun 2015 23:24 UTC)
|
Re: [TML]Question
Kelly St. Clair
(20 Jun 2015 23:58 UTC)
|
Re: [TML]Question
Brett Kruger
(21 Jun 2015 08:47 UTC)
|
Re: [TML]Question
Phil Pugliese
(21 Jun 2015 11:26 UTC)
|
Re: [TML]Question
William Ewing
(21 Jun 2015 17:18 UTC)
|
Re: [TML]Question
Greg Chalik
(21 Jun 2015 00:27 UTC)
|
Re: [TML]Question
William Ewing
(21 Jun 2015 02:25 UTC)
|
Re: [TML]Question
Greg Chalik
(21 Jun 2015 03:09 UTC)
|
Re: [TML]Question
Knapp
(21 Jun 2015 08:27 UTC)
|
Re: [TML]Question
Greg Chalik
(21 Jun 2015 11:25 UTC)
|
Re: [TML]Question
Brett Kruger
(21 Jun 2015 11:49 UTC)
|
Re: [TML]Question
Greg Chalik
(21 Jun 2015 12:58 UTC)
|
Re: [TML]Question
Richard Aiken
(21 Jun 2015 21:42 UTC)
|
Re: [TML]Question
Greg Chalik
(21 Jun 2015 22:11 UTC)
|
Re: [TML]Question
Phil Pugliese
(21 Jun 2015 22:12 UTC)
|
Re: [TML]Question
Kurt Feltenberger
(21 Jun 2015 22:10 UTC)
|
Re: [TML]Question
Greg Chalik
(21 Jun 2015 22:28 UTC)
|
Re: [TML]Question
Kurt Feltenberger
(21 Jun 2015 22:53 UTC)
|
Re: [TML]Question
Greg Chalik
(22 Jun 2015 02:24 UTC)
|
Re: [TML]Question
Kurt Feltenberger
(22 Jun 2015 03:05 UTC)
|
Re: [TML]Question
Greg Chalik
(22 Jun 2015 03:31 UTC)
|
Re: [TML]Question
Kurt Feltenberger
(22 Jun 2015 03:41 UTC)
|
Re: [TML]Question
Greg Chalik
(22 Jun 2015 05:00 UTC)
|
Re: [TML]Question
Knapp
(22 Jun 2015 06:33 UTC)
|
Re: [TML]Question
Greg Chalik
(22 Jun 2015 07:10 UTC)
|
Re: [TML]Question
Greg Chalik
(22 Jun 2015 04:19 UTC)
|
Re: [TML]Question
William Ewing
(22 Jun 2015 19:20 UTC)
|
Re: [TML]Question
Greg Chalik
(22 Jun 2015 23:52 UTC)
|
Re: [TML]Question
Joseph Paul
(21 Jun 2015 22:36 UTC)
|
Re: [TML]Question
Greg Chalik
(22 Jun 2015 02:16 UTC)
|
Re: [TML]Question Tim (22 Jun 2015 13:17 UTC)
|
Re: [TML]Question
Greg Chalik
(22 Jun 2015 23:09 UTC)
|
Re: [TML]Question
Tim
(23 Jun 2015 05:12 UTC)
|
Re: [TML]Question
shadow@xxxxxx
(23 Jun 2015 23:55 UTC)
|
Re: [TML]Question
Greg Chalik
(24 Jun 2015 09:07 UTC)
|
Re: [TML]Question
Brett Kruger
(22 Jun 2015 09:08 UTC)
|
Re: [TML]Question
Greg Chalik
(22 Jun 2015 09:35 UTC)
|
Re: [TML]Question
Kurt Feltenberger
(21 Jun 2015 22:26 UTC)
|
Re: [TML]Question
Greg Chalik
(21 Jun 2015 22:30 UTC)
|
Re: [TML]Question
Kurt Feltenberger
(21 Jun 2015 22:54 UTC)
|
Re: [TML]Question
Phil Pugliese
(22 Jun 2015 00:06 UTC)
|
Re: [TML]Question
Greg Chalik
(22 Jun 2015 02:41 UTC)
|
Re: [TML]Question
Phil Pugliese
(22 Jun 2015 13:37 UTC)
|
Re: [TML]Question
Greg Chalik
(22 Jun 2015 21:53 UTC)
|
Re: [TML]Question
Phil Pugliese
(22 Jun 2015 23:40 UTC)
|
Re: [TML]Question
Greg Chalik
(23 Jun 2015 00:40 UTC)
|
Re: [TML]Question
Phil Pugliese
(23 Jun 2015 01:52 UTC)
|
Re: [TML]Question
Kurt Feltenberger
(23 Jun 2015 02:04 UTC)
|
Re: [TML]Question
Knapp
(23 Jun 2015 06:28 UTC)
|
Re: [TML]Question
Greg Chalik
(23 Jun 2015 06:57 UTC)
|
Re: [TML]Question
Knapp
(23 Jun 2015 07:32 UTC)
|
Re: [TML]Question
Phil Pugliese
(23 Jun 2015 14:19 UTC)
|
Re: [TML]Question
Richard Aiken
(24 Jun 2015 06:18 UTC)
|
Re: [TML]Question
Knapp
(23 Jun 2015 14:45 UTC)
|
Re: [TML]Question
Greg Nokes
(23 Jun 2015 16:05 UTC)
|
Re: [TML]Question
Grimmund
(23 Jun 2015 16:48 UTC)
|
Re: [TML]Question
tmr0195@xxxxxx
(23 Jun 2015 17:49 UTC)
|
Re: [TML]Question
Kurt Feltenberger
(23 Jun 2015 21:42 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Question
Greg Chalik
(24 Jun 2015 02:13 UTC)
|
Re: [TML]Question
Greg Chalik
(24 Jun 2015 01:46 UTC)
|
origins of Traveller (was Re: [TML]Question)
shadow@xxxxxx
(24 Jun 2015 01:19 UTC)
|
Re: origins of Traveller (was Re: [TML]Question)
youngerpliny@xxxxxx
(24 Jun 2015 01:31 UTC)
|
Re: [TML]Question
Greg Chalik
(24 Jun 2015 01:32 UTC)
|
Re: [TML]Question
Kurt Feltenberger
(23 Jun 2015 21:30 UTC)
|
Re: [TML]Question
Greg Chalik
(23 Jun 2015 06:27 UTC)
|
Re: [TML]Question
Phil Pugliese
(23 Jun 2015 13:45 UTC)
|
Re: [TML]Question
William Ewing
(21 Jun 2015 18:20 UTC)
|
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 12:16:22PM +1000, Greg Chalik wrote: > A chaser commander may choose to progress through these, but an > ambusher will simply drop the entire force in on the theatre > objective, orbit-to-objective movement. Yes, you can do a great deal if you have overwhelming aerospace superiority and there are no defending weapons that can touch your craft. Grav technology means a huge advance in mobility, with all sorts of follow-on effects in tactics, logistics, strategy, and even political objectives. If you don't have that overwhelming superiority though, it's a very expensive form of suicide. In an open warfare situation, even approaching orbit is going to be difficult, since Traveller's sensors and weapons typically have effective ranges much greater than planetary diameters. So it's the sort of tactic that could be employed by a powerful interstellar force against a very lightly populated or low-tech planet, especially if the attacking force isn't viewed as a threat, but isn't likely to work well against any credible prepared defender. > The tactics are simple - the entire unit drops from orbit onto the > most obvious location of the planetary seat of Government at about > 50km/s. First it has to slog its way in from the 100D limit, in a good case taking about 3 hours (though in adverse cases it could take a lot longer). If it can get that far, then I suppose it can be assumed that it must have been able to destroy most of the space-based assets, and any ground or orbital defences with significant range. At 50 km/s, it's going to be very obvious where the ships are headed long before they reach atmosphere. After that it gets messy. Whether or not the target was the seat of planetary government, it's up to the defenders whether the top government leaders are there by the time the invaders arrive. Either way, it is likely that a significant portion of the planet's armed forces are in effective range of the landing site. What happens next is variable, but extremely unlikely to be "combat takes 1 minute, surrender negotiations 59 minutes." - Tim