Question
Leslie Bates
(15 Jun 2015 19:47 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Question
Bruce Johnson
(15 Jun 2015 20:01 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Question
Ethan McKinney
(15 Jun 2015 20:19 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Question
Greg Chalik
(15 Jun 2015 22:05 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Question
Richard Aiken
(15 Jun 2015 22:18 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Question
Phil Pugliese
(16 Jun 2015 04:54 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Question
Richard Aiken
(16 Jun 2015 05:04 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Question
Phil Pugliese
(16 Jun 2015 04:49 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Question
Richard Aiken
(15 Jun 2015 22:07 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Question
shadow@xxxxxx
(16 Jun 2015 07:01 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Question
Phil Pugliese
(16 Jun 2015 11:49 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Question
shadow@xxxxxx
(16 Jun 2015 22:42 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Question
Leslie Bates
(16 Jun 2015 07:01 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Question
Richard Aiken
(16 Jun 2015 07:13 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Question
Richard Aiken
(16 Jun 2015 07:25 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Question
Bruce Johnson
(16 Jun 2015 17:19 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Question
Phil Pugliese
(16 Jun 2015 19:42 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Question
Grimmund
(16 Jun 2015 20:08 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Question
Phil Pugliese
(16 Jun 2015 20:48 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Question
Kurt Feltenberger
(17 Jun 2015 00:22 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Question
Greg Chalik
(17 Jun 2015 00:53 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Question
Phil Pugliese
(17 Jun 2015 01:59 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Question
Greg Chalik
(17 Jun 2015 05:10 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Question
Richard Aiken
(17 Jun 2015 05:18 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Question
Greg Chalik
(17 Jun 2015 06:19 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Question
Richard Aiken
(17 Jun 2015 08:06 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Question
Greg Chalik
(18 Jun 2015 01:44 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Question
Phil Pugliese
(17 Jun 2015 13:52 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Question
Phil Pugliese
(17 Jun 2015 13:32 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Question
Greg Chalik
(18 Jun 2015 02:17 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Question
Grimmund
(16 Jun 2015 20:12 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Question
Bruce Johnson
(16 Jun 2015 21:36 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Question
Colin Paddock
(17 Jun 2015 00:07 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Question
Kurt Feltenberger
(17 Jun 2015 00:24 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Question
Phil Pugliese
(17 Jun 2015 01:54 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Question
Greg Chalik
(17 Jun 2015 03:52 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Question Phil Pugliese (17 Jun 2015 11:59 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Question
Greg Chalik
(18 Jun 2015 02:09 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Question
Phil Pugliese
(17 Jun 2015 01:43 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Question
Greg Chalik
(17 Jun 2015 03:28 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Question
Phil Pugliese
(17 Jun 2015 11:48 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Question
Bruce Johnson
(17 Jun 2015 16:12 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Question
Phil Pugliese
(17 Jun 2015 19:05 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Question
Kelly St. Clair
(18 Jun 2015 00:30 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Question
Bruce Johnson
(18 Jun 2015 01:33 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Question
Kelly St. Clair
(18 Jun 2015 15:57 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Question
Bruce Johnson
(18 Jun 2015 16:18 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Question
Phil Pugliese
(19 Jun 2015 13:16 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Question
Joseph Paul
(18 Jun 2015 16:58 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Question
Joseph Paul
(18 Jun 2015 17:35 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Question
Richard Aiken
(18 Jun 2015 22:22 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Question
Brad Rogers
(19 Jun 2015 05:26 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Question
Richard Aiken
(19 Jun 2015 07:03 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Question
Knapp
(19 Jun 2015 07:58 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Question
Richard Aiken
(19 Jun 2015 09:55 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Question
Knapp
(19 Jun 2015 10:44 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Question
Greg Chalik
(19 Jun 2015 11:35 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Question
Richard Aiken
(20 Jun 2015 07:38 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Question
Phil Pugliese
(19 Jun 2015 13:48 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Question
Bruce Johnson
(19 Jun 2015 16:51 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Question
tmr0195@xxxxxx
(19 Jun 2015 21:36 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Question
Knapp
(19 Jun 2015 21:43 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Question
Bruce Johnson
(19 Jun 2015 22:38 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Question
tmr0195@xxxxxx
(20 Jun 2015 05:46 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Question
Greg Chalik
(20 Jun 2015 04:48 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Question
Bruce Johnson
(20 Jun 2015 15:46 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Question
Greg Chalik
(21 Jun 2015 00:19 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Question
Phil Pugliese
(21 Jun 2015 02:52 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Question
Brad Rogers
(19 Jun 2015 10:27 UTC)
|
Formats [WAS: Re: [TML] Question]
Greg Nokes
(19 Jun 2015 13:19 UTC)
|
Re: Formats [WAS: Re: [TML] Question]
Richard Aiken
(20 Jun 2015 07:20 UTC)
|
Re: Formats [WAS: Re: [TML] Question]
Greg Nokes
(22 Jun 2015 00:01 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Question
Grimmund
(19 Jun 2015 13:17 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Question
Richard Aiken
(20 Jun 2015 08:06 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Question
Richard Aiken
(20 Jun 2015 08:11 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Question
Grimmund
(21 Jun 2015 12:59 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Question
Greg Chalik
(21 Jun 2015 04:19 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Question
Greg Chalik
(21 Jun 2015 03:50 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Question
Richard Aiken
(21 Jun 2015 04:01 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Question
Joseph Paul
(21 Jun 2015 22:31 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Question
rupert.boleyn@xxxxxx
(22 Jun 2015 00:01 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Question
Joseph Paul
(22 Jun 2015 02:32 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Question
Greg Chalik
(22 Jun 2015 03:22 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Question
Phil Pugliese
(22 Jun 2015 14:02 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Question
Joseph Paul
(29 Jun 2015 06:50 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Question
Greg Chalik
(22 Jun 2015 01:43 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Question
Greg Chalik
(17 Jun 2015 03:33 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Question
Kurt Feltenberger
(17 Jun 2015 03:41 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Question
Phil Pugliese
(17 Jun 2015 11:54 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Question
Kurt Feltenberger
(17 Jun 2015 00:20 UTC)
|
I've read in more than one book that original Sherman's had a 75mm gun which was found to be inadequate & was soon replaced w/ the 3" gun. It was even reflected in some 70's era tactical wargames. One in particular, as I recall, was 'Tank' published by SPI around 1973, I believe. I also don't believe that he Sherman was ready to go in 1941. Weren't we still supplying the Grant/Lee to the brits in 1942? -------------------------------------------- On Tue, 6/16/15, Greg Chalik <mrg3105@gmail.com> wrote: Subject: Re: [TML] Question To: "tml@simplelists.com" <tml@simplelists.com> Date: Tuesday, June 16, 2015, 8:51 PM On 17 June 2015 at 11:54, Phil Pugliese (via tml list) <nobody@simplelists.com> wrote: 17pdr gun The M4 did not have a wimpy 75mm gun in 1941. The Ordnance QF 17pdr wasn't available until 1943. Integrating a new weapon into an existing tank design is not what most engineers would advise since the costs can be quite prohibitive. The thinking in the US was that the the M26 was going to be ready 'any day now', which didn't happen. The thinking in the UK was that the Centurion 'universal' tank wasn't going to be ready in time, so a LIMITED conversion program was a reasonable accounting risk. Israelis faced the same choice in the 50s when converting the same Shermans to the M50/51 spec. Greg ----- The Traveller Mailing List Archives at http://archives.simplelists.com/tml Report problems to listmom@travellercentral.com To unsubscribe from this list please goto http://www.simplelists.com/confirm.php?u=EwREIRgLK8vaUEhNlnoNdSGKwnjoID8a