[TML} Psionics & Genetics
Jim Vassilakos
(05 Oct 2024 04:05 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] [TML} Psionics & Genetics
Phil Pugliese
(05 Oct 2024 06:30 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] [TML} Psionics & Genetics
Rupert Boleyn
(05 Oct 2024 23:55 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] [TML} Psionics & Genetics
Phil Pugliese
(06 Oct 2024 14:22 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] [TML} Psionics & Genetics
Charles McKnight
(06 Oct 2024 15:12 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] [TML} Psionics & Genetics
Rupert Boleyn
(06 Oct 2024 22:27 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] [TML} Psionics & Genetics
kaladorn@xxxxxx
(07 Oct 2024 03:14 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] [TML} Psionics & Genetics
Rupert Boleyn
(07 Oct 2024 04:03 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] [TML} Psionics & Genetics Alex Goodwin (07 Oct 2024 04:47 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] [TML} Psionics & Genetics
Jim Vassilakos
(07 Oct 2024 06:02 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] [TML} Psionics & Genetics
Alex Goodwin
(07 Oct 2024 07:28 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] [TML} Psionics & Genetics
trent shipley
(07 Oct 2024 08:39 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] [TML} Psionics & Genetics
Phil Pugliese
(07 Oct 2024 11:26 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] [TML} Psionics & Genetics
Phil Pugliese
(07 Oct 2024 20:16 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] [TML} Psionics & Genetics
Rupert Boleyn
(07 Oct 2024 08:35 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] [TML} Psionics & Genetics
Phil Pugliese
(07 Oct 2024 11:12 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] [TML} Psionics & Genetics
kaladorn@xxxxxx
(07 Oct 2024 03:12 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] [TML} Psionics & Genetics
Phil Pugliese
(07 Oct 2024 04:11 UTC)
|
On 7/10/24 14:03, Rupert Boleyn - rupert.boleyn at gmail.com (via tml list) wrote: > > > On 07Oct2024 1613, kaladorn at gmail.com (via tml list) wrote: >> I'd like the multi-gene aspect, but I also point out it isn't just >> having a gene, it is the particular expression it takes. That also >> means more variability than just having the gene. > > Hence a complex of genes. I'd assume that many of them also do quite > mundane things - they aren't particularly 'psionic', but their > activity influences any psionic powers a person has. Nothing so crude > as the 'traditional' 'psions have red hair' thing, but more like > "Those psions with blood factor CO(b) are more likely to have the > potential to teleport". > -- There's not merely genetics, there's also _epi_genetics - the study of heritable changes in gene expression (such as, for this discussion, psionics) (active versus inactive genes) that _do not involve changes to the underlying DNA sequence_ (a change in phenotype without change in genotype) that in turn affects how cells read the genes. Ie, not only nature, not only nurture, but their _interaction_ and a helping of deep fried cheesy *FNORD*. As I mentioned when quoting from GT:AR1, the gestational mother (whether actual person, or artificial womb) has a _major_ effect, assuming all else equal and all genetic systems go for psionics, on what powers the child ultimately expresses, if any. A tubthumpingly potentially-powerful child carried by a non-psionic mother will be significantly more likely to develop fewer, and less diverse, powers than the same child (clone, identical twin, etc) carried by a psionic mother, assuming the two were then raised together in a psionic household as twins. To me, that argues for a (in this case pre-natal) epigenetic effect, above and beyond gene complexes with incomplete penetrance (since, by hypothesis, the children were genetically identical). On the other hand, a child with the genetic psionic potential of the average TTL7 housebrick isn't going to be likely to express the same power and diversity of powers (most likely, none) as either of the two children mentioned above, no matter the abilities of their gestational mother or household they were then raised in. Alex