T4 QSDS Question
tmr0195@xxxxxx
(25 Apr 2015 22:45 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] T4 QSDS Question
Bruce Johnson
(26 Apr 2015 02:05 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] T4 QSDS Question
tmr0195@xxxxxx
(26 Apr 2015 03:33 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] T4 QSDS Question
Derek Wildstar
(28 Apr 2015 16:21 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] T4 QSDS Question
tmr0195@xxxxxx
(28 Apr 2015 22:25 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] T4 QSDS Question
Derek Wildstar
(29 Apr 2015 20:19 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] T4 QSDS Question
tmr0195@xxxxxx
(29 Apr 2015 23:39 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] T4 QSDS Question
Derek Wildstar
(30 Apr 2015 12:58 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] T4 QSDS Question
tmr0195@xxxxxx
(30 Apr 2015 15:35 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] T4 QSDS Question
Derek Wildstar
(30 Apr 2015 21:04 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] T4 QSDS Question
Ethan McKinney
(30 Apr 2015 21:18 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] T4 QSDS Question
tmr0195@xxxxxx
(01 May 2015 02:10 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] T4 QSDS Question
tmr0195@xxxxxx
(01 May 2015 00:01 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] T4 QSDS Question
Derek Wildstar
(01 May 2015 15:49 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] T4 QSDS Question
tmr0195@xxxxxx
(02 May 2015 04:48 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] T4 QSDS Question: Sensors
tmr0195@xxxxxx
(02 May 2015 15:10 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] T4 QSDS Question: Sensors
tmr0195@xxxxxx
(03 May 2015 15:52 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] T4 QSDS Question: Sensors
tmr0195@xxxxxx
(04 May 2015 19:29 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] T4 QSDS Question: Sensors
Derek Wildstar
(05 May 2015 01:31 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] T4 QSDS Question: Sensors tmr0195@xxxxxx (05 May 2015 06:34 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] T4 QSDS Question: Sensors
tmr0195@xxxxxx
(05 May 2015 20:43 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] T4 QSDS Question: Sensors
Derek Wildstar
(05 May 2015 21:22 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] T4 QSDS Question: Sensors
tmr0195@xxxxxx
(06 May 2015 15:29 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] T4 QSDS Question: Sensors
tmr0195@xxxxxx
(06 May 2015 20:20 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] T4 QSDS Question: Sensors
tmr0195@xxxxxx
(07 May 2015 15:45 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] T4 QSDS Question: Sensors
Derek Wildstar
(07 May 2015 20:34 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] T4 QSDS Question: Sensors
tmr0195@xxxxxx
(08 May 2015 00:04 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] T4 QSDS Question: Sensors
tmr0195@xxxxxx
(08 May 2015 03:23 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] T4 QSDS Question: Sensors
tmr0195@xxxxxx
(08 May 2015 13:40 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] T4 QSDS Question: Sensors
Ethan McKinney
(09 May 2015 02:50 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] T4 QSDS Question: Sensors
tmr0195@xxxxxx
(09 May 2015 21:33 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] T4 QSDS Question: Sensors
Ethan McKinney
(09 May 2015 21:41 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] T4 QSDS Question: Sensors
tmr0195@xxxxxx
(11 May 2015 18:54 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] T4 QSDS Question: Sensors
Ethan McKinney
(11 May 2015 19:59 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] T4 QSDS Question: Sensors
tmr0195@xxxxxx
(11 May 2015 23:48 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] T4 QSDS Question: Sensors
Derek Wildstar
(05 May 2015 01:26 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] T4 QSDS Question: Sensors
tmr0195@xxxxxx
(05 May 2015 05:43 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] T4 QSDS Question: Sensors
Derek Wildstar
(05 May 2015 21:19 UTC)
|
Hello again Guy, -----Original Message----- From: Derek Wildstar Sent: Monday, May 04, 2015 6:31 PM To: xxxxxx@simplelists.com Subject: Re: [TML] T4 QSDS Question: Sensors Tom, > If I understand correctly, the issue is that the minimum length was > computed assuming that the antennae would be a folding array if necessary, > but > the volumes were computed assuming that the antennae would be a fixed > array. The QSDS 1.5e HRT/PEMS antenna volumes appears to be calculated using the fixed array modifier of 0.05. A HRT with a short range of 60,000 km has a fixed antenna diameter of 10 m per TNE FF&S p. 53. The QSDS 1.5e TL-9 Basic Package has the min length of a hull as being 5 m, which would be my guess as the length of a 10 m diameter array being folded down for storage. On May 4, 2015, at 3:29 PM, Tom Rux <xxxxxx@comcast.net> wrote: >> My recommendation is to change the table Min Length data to match the >> antenna diameter in TNE FF&S Mk I Mod 0 for the HRT in TL-9 and the >> PEMS in TL-10+. An alternative would be to recalculate all of the values >> based on a folding array. > I'd support either approach. The only "gotcha" I can think of is that > there needs to be some type of TL-9 sensor array that will fit on a > 100-ton hull. The TL-9 Basic and Improved packages with a 60,000 km HRT has a fixed antenna diameter of 10 m. Per the note below the TNE FF&S HRT table: "AD: Antenna diameter, in meters. If the antenna diameter is greater than the hull length (unmodified by configuration), the antenna must be a folding array. On the Hull Size Table, TNE FF&S Mk I Mod p. 11, a 100 Td hull has a length (L) of 14 m which means that a 60,000 km HRT with a 10 m fixed antenna can be mounted on a 100 Td hull. Of course the amount of surface area as discussed in the reply dated 5/4/2015 6:26 PM has to be considered when selecting an array. The actual "gotcha" is that the 100 Td Scout/Courier can not use a small military sensor package. To fix the "gotcha" I would used the scouts full 45 m versus the base length of 14 m. > ---Guy "Wildstar" Garnett > xxxxxx@prismnet.com Hopefully I'll be posting the TL-9 sensor packages on 5/6 or 5/7. The Improved and Small Military packages only have adjusted MCr. The Basic, as already posted, changed volume and MCr. My calculations for Medium Military package have returned different volume, , power, cost, and area values using both the spreadsheet and manual calculations. Tom Rux