On Apr 4, 2015, at 6:36 AM, Postmark <postmark.design@btinternet.com> wrote:

> On 4 Apr 2015, at 07:35, Richard Aiken <raikenclw@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 1:52 PM, Christopher Hilton <chris@vindaloo.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Apr 3, 2015, at 11:52 AM, Kurt Feltenberger <kurt@thepaw.org> wrote:
>>
>> > On 4/3/2015 12:33 AM, Christopher Hilton wrote:
>> >> That looks cool but it’s decidedly low tech as far as I can see. If I were still gaming I would embed or build a 32+ ~ 40+ inch TV into my gaming table under a piece of plexiglass.
>>
>>  Maybe I should think about my own kickstarter timed of course not to compete with this very worthy effort.
>>
>>
>> Your $12,500.00 Stretch Goal could be this:
>>
>>  http://www.jtfbus.com/item.cfm?ID=13503&gclid=CjwKEAjw9PioBRDdpqy0-ofG3DgSJAACe5NE46sND-ZTakwqzLOfdGiXl3zhfCdjvU5MgzLZBrLNsRoCOqHw_wcB
>>
> That seems very expensive, compared to, say, this (from the top of my google search)
> http://www.promultis.info/portfolio-item/promultis-table
>
> The 84" 4K display might be a bit heavy for backpacking and I think that you'll need an actual,
> not digital, referee's screen...
>
> Phil Kitching

The thing that would really make it a development project would be the touch screen. I could do it without touch screen for $1000 + the cost of the table. Touch would multiply that by 4x ~ 10x.

Chris

      __o          "All I was trying to do was get home from work."
    _`\<,_           -Rosa Parks
___(*)/_(*)____.___o____..___..o...________ooO..._____________________
Christopher Sean Hilton                    [chris/at/vindaloo/dot/com]