quick Trait question
Timothy Collinson
(12 May 2024 20:45 UTC)
|
Re: quick Trait question
Timothy Collinson
(12 May 2024 20:46 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] quick Trait question
James Catchpole
(12 May 2024 21:31 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] quick Trait question
Timothy Collinson
(13 May 2024 06:45 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] quick Trait question
Richard Aiken
(13 May 2024 22:02 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] quick Trait question
Jeff Zeitlin
(13 May 2024 22:32 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] quick Trait question Jeff Zeitlin (13 May 2024 23:10 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] quick Trait question
Timothy Collinson
(15 May 2024 04:44 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] quick Trait question
Timothy Collinson
(15 May 2024 04:39 UTC)
|
On Mon, 13 May 2024 18:02:36 -0400, Richard Aiken - raikenclw at gmail.com (via tml list) <xxxxxx@simplelists.com> wrote to Freelance Traveller: >Question: does this biological night vision have the same quirk as >mechanical night vision (eg converting an image into differing shades of >one particular color)? Sorry, accidentally hit send too soon... There is no way to answer that question; an entity that has night vision as an inherent biological process also has a brain that can handle the processing of that vision. (Note that the answer would be the same if you'd asked about IR vision or UV vision.) More, the mechanism of 'night vision' isn't specified, so there's no way of knowing whether it's implemented as a higher sensitivity to lower levels of electromagnetic radiation within a specific spectrum, or whether it's some other mechanism, such as the sort of thermal sensitivity that some snakes have, or something else entirely that isn't really "vision" but is connected to the eyes or the same region of the brain that processes the entity's vision. The reason that mechanical night vision converts an image into false color or shades of a single color is because it needs to feed the data into a biological subsystem that isn't actually set up to accommodate it. If one were to get implants that fed directly into the vision center of the brain, without any conversion, eventually the brain would learn to handle it, but _how_ might vary from person to person. There's actually a sound reason for night-vision goggles to convert into shades of a single color; the human eye has two classes of sensors, called rods and cones. Cones have responsiveness that makes it possible to see color and fine detail, and this requires a fairly high level of input; rods are what give us the ability to see gross shapes and movement, which requires a lower level of input. By converting to shades of a single color, night-vision goggles "play" to the rods, which is what you're going to want if you need the night vision enhancement. There have been experiments done; if you put inverter lenses in front of a person's eyes, and don't take them off for any reason, eventually the brain adjusts, and the person sees through the lenses as being "right side up". If you then take the lenses away, the brain has to go through the readjustment all over again - but it does happen. Night vision implants would be the same. ®Traveller is a registered trademark of Far Future Enterprises, 1977-2024. Use of the trademark in this notice and in the referenced materials is not intended to infringe or devalue the trademark. -- Jeff Zeitlin, Editor Freelance Traveller The Electronic Fan-Supported Traveller® Resource xxxxxx@freelancetraveller.com http://www.freelancetraveller.com Freelance Traveller extends its thanks to the following enterprises for hosting services: onCloud/CyberWeb Enterprises (http://www.oncloud.io) The Traveller Downport (http://www.downport.com)