T5 Rules question
Jeffrey Schwartz
(24 Feb 2015 16:15 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] T5 Rules question
tmr0195@xxxxxx
(24 Feb 2015 17:53 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] T5 Rules question
Richard Aiken
(24 Feb 2015 20:13 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] T5 Rules question
Jeffrey Schwartz
(24 Feb 2015 20:51 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] T5 Rules question
Richard Aiken
(24 Feb 2015 21:23 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] T5 Rules question
Phil Pugliese
(24 Feb 2015 21:23 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] T5 Rules question
Bruce Johnson
(24 Feb 2015 21:50 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] T5 Rules question
Phil Pugliese
(24 Feb 2015 21:55 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] T5 Rules question
Bruce Johnson
(24 Feb 2015 21:27 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] T5 Rules question
Phil Pugliese
(24 Feb 2015 21:51 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] T5 Rules question
Richard Aiken
(24 Feb 2015 22:05 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] T5 Rules question
Bruce Johnson
(24 Feb 2015 22:11 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] T5 Rules question
Bruce Johnson
(24 Feb 2015 22:21 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] T5 Rules question
Richard Aiken
(24 Feb 2015 22:48 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] T5 Rules question
Bruce Johnson
(25 Feb 2015 00:41 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] T5 Rules question
Edward Swatschek
(25 Feb 2015 09:12 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] T5 Rules question Jeffrey Schwartz (25 Feb 2015 14:47 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] T5 Rules question
tmr0195@xxxxxx
(25 Feb 2015 21:27 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] T5 Rules question
Jeffrey Schwartz
(27 Feb 2015 14:29 UTC)
|
RE: [TML] T5 Rules question
Anthony Jackson
(25 Feb 2015 01:27 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] T5 Rules question
Richard Aiken
(25 Feb 2015 01:48 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] T5 Rules question
Kelly St. Clair
(25 Feb 2015 06:12 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] T5 Rules question
Phil Pugliese
(25 Feb 2015 07:39 UTC)
|
RE: [TML] T5 Rules question
Phil Pugliese
(25 Feb 2015 04:18 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] T5 Rules question
Dan Corrin
(24 Feb 2015 21:34 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] T5 Rules question
Bruce Johnson
(24 Feb 2015 21:54 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] T5 Rules question
Grimmund
(24 Feb 2015 22:15 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] T5 Rules question
Kurt Feltenberger
(25 Feb 2015 02:54 UTC)
|
I think I got it figured out... and part of me is applauding Mr. Miller's cleverness, and part of me is scratching my head and wondering if it's a good thing. This is all IMHO and YMMV and MDA (Many Disclaimers Apply) It looks like the progression is: TL 6-8: Sundry early fusion reactors that meet Power Plant A specs for use in ships... barely. TL9 - Standard fusion reactor for power plant A TL10-13 : progressively better power plant A variations TL14+: Plateau for fusion Power Plant A. We've pushed it to the limit, and can't make it any better. However, the fuel consumption is dropping, and you can now fit a Power-B + fuel into the space a Power-A + fuel used to be. TL 16: Earliest Antimatter power plant A TL 17/18: Antimatter improves TL 19: Standard Antimatter Power Plant A Similar things apply for the other drives as well. Building a TL-15 Jump-5 Scout looks possible... A TL-19 Type-S looks... wow. On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 4:12 AM, Edward Swatschek <xxxxxx@bitslayer.net> wrote: > On 2015-02-24 14:21, Bruce Johnson wrote: >> >> If someone puts up a skyscraper in the nice mountain views, you cannot >> just move around them. >> > > This is Traveller. You hire a group of ne'er-do-wells, inexplicably stuck > on planet until they raise some cash, to demo the skyscraper while > implicating a third party. > > > -- > Edward Swatschek - xxxxxx@bitslayer.net > > > ----- > The Traveller Mailing List > Archives at http://archives.simplelists.com/tml > Report problems to xxxxxx@travellercentral.com > To unsubscribe from this list please goto > http://www.simplelists.com/confirm.php?u=vSy3NFQJMSbZKrzPfC3XucFBsUCMtKrI